this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
684 points (99.7% liked)

Shirts That Go Hard

7308 readers
4 users here now

Share shirts that go hard.

Example A, B, C1 C2


Community Rules

1) Be nice and have fun.

Site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them.

2) No racism, xenophobia, sexism, supremacism, sexualization of minors, rape content, or gore.

3) No AI Generated Content of any kind.

AI generated content of any kind is not allowed in this community; as decided by the community of July 2025

  1. No Mockup Shirts - We want to see the actual shirt worn in real life, not just a depiction.
  1. No Advertising - This applies to someone else or yourself.
  1. No Spamming - Please refrain from sharing the same thing over and over again, and/or posting new content more than three times a day.

Thank you.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/27543598

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Smokey is not a mascot of the National Park Service, but the Forest Service, which is under the Department of Agriculture (national forests are a “crop”).

National Park Service is under the Department of Interior.

Get your federal agencies straight!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

nationalforests

It's okay to leave the space in there.

[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Damn right!

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You aren't actually supposed to prevent forest fires though, hence why Canada switched the bear for this twink:

[–] NeatoBuilds@mander.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Congrats on the baby, smokey

[–] centipede_powder@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's a risky congrats. Maybe she really likes beer and cake.

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Have you seen the bulge on that bear?!

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

She's carrying high.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Are you talking about red shirt?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But really, who needs trees? They just provide oxygen, clean the air, enrich the soil, prevent soil erosion, help save energy, help prevent water pollution, provide places for animals to live, provide shelter from the sun, help with drought mediation, capture rain water, make areas cooler during the summer, and help with climate.

But other than that, what do we even need them for?

[–] NeatoBuilds@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Sounds like sociannism to me

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They didn't actually, did they?

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We sell it to Sears in 2025

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought Sears got bought by Bob's Bait Shack. Or was it Sally's Dry Cleaning and Fried Chicken Emporium?

[–] NeatoBuilds@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everything is owned by four seasons

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

eats fly conspiratorially

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Just rake the leaves /s

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't help but think they really are going to be severely defunded. Musky can only see value in police/military.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The house proposed $210m or so in cuts for them for 2025. So 6% of their budget. While inflation has clearly gone up. Staff is down 23% since 2010, before these cuts.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They'll soon just be a collection of oil wells, shopping centers, and expensive apartments.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

collection of oil wells, shopping centers, and expensive apartments

Soooooooo Houston?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just rake the forest.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Even if you love oil extortionists and their bribes, global warming denial includes not funding adaptation/protections from its effects. In the case of forest fires, it is also a major source of additional CO2 emissions. Trees/land globally are counted on to suck up 14 gt of CO2 per year, if they don't burn, and have enough water to live. In 2023, net co2 absorbtion was only 0.5 gt. 1/10th usual amount with "usual fires". 2024 had big fires in Amazon.

The cheapest non-energy-related global warming mitigation is forest management and fire containment.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 1 points 2 years ago

Qu'est-ce que c'est que ce kebab derrière l'ours ?