this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
796 points (99.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

12525 readers
3444 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 minutes ago

Who's ready for... ... ... manhacks?!

You get a manhack, you get a manhack, everbody gets a manhack!!!

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 45 minutes ago

If this is you:
You are a bad person, you are evil. I sincerely hope there is a hell and you go there once you die. Murderer!

[–] NovaVeles@lemmy.world 3 points 52 minutes ago

Well those wedding parties aren't going to drone bomb themselves!

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 33 minutes ago

Eagle Eye (film) has an added level.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 26 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I hate modern tech. When I was naiver I would see this project as incredibly cool and fascinating; I still think is very cool from a technical perspective. But knowing where and how it'll be used, is just sad.

[–] NovaVeles@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

This is why we should be teaching the humanities to engineers from the beginning. We should be questioning what value these things can bring and how said tech can be used to do the opposite. Don't just focus on the technical achievement, a flex of ego driven technique.

I'm not saying, don't do something because it might have blow back but you have to weigh up the cost-benefit ratio.

Recently there was a demo of a drone that spins in place so that it looks like a faint smudge rather than, well a drone. Their justification was that it could be used to do wildlife watching without interference with the animals... almost everyone else saw this as a near invisible bomb.

Every day I see something new that makes me realize that there are too many in that field that do not think about these issues until it is too late. That they do not realize or do not care that their work will be leveraged into the next hell on earth until it is too late.

Alas this is nothing new, Wernher von Braun by Tom Lehrer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjDEsGZLbio

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 34 minutes ago

So, they hired some naive children to develop this SAD thing? Because otherwise, they might have a conscience to stop this shit.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

This is almost a decade old.

It was a fictional future.

We’re pretty much there.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

This will be used in terror attacks.

[–] Slayer@infosec.pub 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So the resistance will have to move underground, literally.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 2 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago) (2 children)

I wonder how these things work when the target is still and camouflaged. I’m sure adding infrared would be trivial but infrared can be foiled by a tarp, I’m sure we could figure that out, a tarp with camouflage on one side seems pretty easy

[–] NovaVeles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

I guess it is like most things. There is always a work around but what is the cost of said work around. Even if you can camouflage yourself from things like this, you still take on additional burden of having to address this.

[–] NotAnOtter@lemmus.org 2 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

They're light weight optic models. You're right that infrared and other wavelengths are trivial to train on but the compute becomes expensive and the combined battery + chips become very heavy for these drones that also need to carry an explosive payload AND remain nimble to function. Flying through a forest means rapidly adjusting course constantly for branches and whatnot.

We've had the technology to do this for over a decade. The reason we haven't seen these in war yet is because they don't work especially well and there are cheaper + better options.

[–] NovaVeles@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

I suspect that as SOC performance continues to improve, the power demands and AI complexity will eventually over come this. Yes, your phone can play subway surfers at 8K but that same chip could also end up on the receiving end of a drone.

I mean a Snapdragon X2 can give a lot of image processing performance for about 20watts of power draw. That same work load would have been 200-1000 watts a decade back, and power draw is still being reduced with larger ASIC designs.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 25 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Ooh, movie idea: a take on The Most Dangerous Game where some rich dude uses an AI system to hunt humans for sport but the AI, being programmed to hunt something dangerous, determines that the rich dude is now the target because he’s the one setting the whole thing up. Tables are turned. Maybe the rich dude now finds himself in the trenches with the poor folks he’d captured?

[–] NovaVeles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Oh now that is a good film idea!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Your comment illustrates the difference between sci-fi and fantasy.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

~~Jurrasic~~The Most Dangerous Park

[–] JustTheWind@lemmy.world 42 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

In a timeline where the US war machine, among others, continues to function exactly like an infinite money glitch; we get to experience the privilege of watching an ever accelerating boom of brilliant innovations, all with the shared purpose of continuing to drive humanity backwards.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] x0x7@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Theodore Kaczynski knew things.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 199 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

In GPS and RF denied environments too. You know, your typical search and rescue scenario.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 151 points 7 hours ago (10 children)

You are being rescued, do not resist!

load more comments
view more: next ›