this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2026
774 points (98.4% liked)

Comics

1799 readers
1438 users here now

Post your comics here. Single or multi boxed comics.

Please mark nsfw when appropriate.

Same rules as primary server, no hate.

Please warn others if there may be triggers.

Please mark if the comic is yours either in the title or description

obvious ai images will be removed, please include a source to prevent this

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://thisecommercelife.com/blogs/comics/the-day-all-billionaires-died

I'm sure it's annoying for some to click offsite, but it's 20 panels long. IMO worth the read, though!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The wild thing is you could probably live off only 1 million invested at say 3 percent, a whole life.

Billions? That should be just unlawful.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Well that would mean a return of 30k annually, which is a pretty low quality of life in the US. If you lived in a low COL place it may be enough to get by, but you can't live in any US city with that.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Sure but assuming you’re healthy and relatively young you could just not touch any of it and roll the interest back into it. In 23-24 years it’d be 2 million and your 3% return would be 60k. More if you added excess earnings to it during that period, of course

Of course depending on risk tolerance you could speed this up considerably. Bonds are more like 4-5% and stocks are closer to 10%. But then of course risk raises, sometimes considerably but a 7% return more than halves the timeline to around a decade (though keep in mind sometimes bubbles burst, 2008 returns were -38% and that AI bubble is getting shakier and shakier)

The bigger issue is lifestyle creep and consumerism. The majority of people who get to this level of wealth get attracted to relentless consumerism. Then 60k, which can easily cover cost of living in most areas (especially with the assumption that your housing is paid for and otherwise debt free), is suddenly no longer adequate

And of course the biggest issue is that 99% of people will never have the financial resources to even consider the above

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You can also use the $M up slowly.

Sure, no golden toilets, but food on the table and more for life is kinda a lot IMO. But that was not what the example was for ofc.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You can use the 1.000.000 dollars during your lifespan too.

that might be a fine strategy if you're retirement age, but for younger people that isn't a good idea

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 22 points 11 hours ago

I wouldnt tell anyone i got superpowers but there woild be signs

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, HIGH-FIVE on that! Subnormality is in a brilliant, unique class of its own, and I need to figure out how to post more of them on our comics subs. Which, actually... oh! Oh, oh, oh.

Okay, there's a technique I've been using for some time now at my own community that I think will work nicely. Oh my...

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Always good to see another fan of their work

Recently re-read Shirley Estar Goes To Heaven (In both forms, even if the original comic was VERY early 00's edgy, it was still a DAMN good comic, and the novel rewrite is 10/10 scifi)

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Recently re-read Shirley Estar Goes To Heaven (In both forms, even if the original comic was VERY early 00’s edgy, it was still a DAMN good comic, and the novel rewrite is 10/10 scifi)

Hang on, hang on, that's also by Rowntree?

TBH, I only check in with Subnormality every couple months, altho I've been reading for... shoot, it must ~20yrs now. oO

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Both the original graphic novel and the actual novel are :D

Same here, absolutely wild to think how different the webcomc scene was back then

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I love that even in this made up fantasy world (which is awesome btw), we're still only able to pay teachers "Close" to what they're worth.

Like, lol. Teachers are so fucked from a livable wage standpoint, that it would take 2 made up billionaire apocalypses to give them enough money to be paid what they're actually worth.

[–] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The problem with teachers is that they are part of the job market. And as a market, its subject to supply and demand. The supply of teachers is higher than the demand. (Society has also screwed this up artificially with class size etc). Teaching also has non monetary benefits. Summers off, often shorter daily work schedule. The fun of watching children grow (for some people).

But the real problem is that children almost always grow up to choose a profession they are familliar with. And nearly all children are familiar with teachers. This leads many people to think its a profession they could do, and thus a goal to achieve. This increases the number of teachers, deiving the demand down.

I also found that growing up 20 years ago, the bad teachers are impossible to get rid of. Also increasing supply. Not sure how true this is today or if any changes there have been made.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"Teachers were finally paid closer to their worth."

I dunno, I just think the phrasing "closer to their worth" is really funny when the picture being painted is a hopeful one. We can't actually hope that teachers will get a decent pay, even in a better world.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 17 points 12 hours ago

Kinda the point I think. It's not a completely Utopian fantasy, and plenty of the capitalistic (etc) problems that already existed would still be here.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a bit existentially confused by the anticapitalist webcomic being hosted on Shopify.

[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You do not have to exist outside of a system to critique it.

[–] apparia@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 17 minutes ago

Agree, it's not a criticism of the comic or author, I just found it ironic.

load more comments
view more: next ›