this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

85274 readers
4134 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1
Even Apple finally admits that 8GB RAM isn't enough (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 2 years ago by sverit@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There were a number of exciting announcements from Apple at WWDC 2024, from macOS Sequoia to Apple Intelligence. However, a subtle addition to Xcode 16 — the development environment for Apple platforms, like iOS and macOS — is a feature called Predictive Code Completion. Unfortunately, if you bought into Apple's claim that 8GB of unified memory was enough for base-model Apple silicon Macs, you won't be able to use it. There's a memory requirement for Predictive Code Completion in Xcode 16, and it's the closest thing we'll get from Apple to an admission that 8GB of memory isn't really enough for a new Mac in 2024.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

imagine showing this post to someone in 1995

shit has gotten too bloated these days. i mean even in my head 8GB still sounds like 'a lot' of RAM and 16GB feels extravagant

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I still can't fully accept that 1GB is not normal, 2GB is not very good, and 4GB is not all you ever gonna need.

If only it got bloated for some good reasons.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I remember when I got my first computer with 1GB of RAM, where my previous computer had 64MB, later upgraded to 192MB. And there were only like 3 or 4 years in between them.

It was like: holy shit, now I can put all the things in RAM. I will never run out.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

The moment you use a file that is bigger than 1GB, that computer will explode.

Some of us do more than just browse Lemmy.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't believe, there's no Linux reference yet!

Give your "8 gigs not enough" hardware to one of us and see it revived running faster than whatever you're running now with your subpar OS.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

I can run Arch Linux (BTW!) in a potato with starch RAM!