this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
452 points (97.3% liked)

politics

31826 readers
2923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Assembly Bill 2164 authored by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda) would have prohibited California’s governor from recognizing a request for extradition of a person related to their providing a legally protected healthcare activity in the Golden State to transgender individuals, or if they provide reproductive services. It provided certain exemptions, such as an extradition required by federal law.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unspeakablehorror@thelemmy.club 90 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He also vetoed telework protections for us state workers and we are on the verge of a strike because his admin has returned our union's proposals with... ZERO. Literally, NOTHING. Their response to our demands in union negotations was 'how about nothing, instead?'

He has clearly become red-pilled, idk what's wrong with him but the most cynical interpretation would be money, stupidest interpretation would be he thinks this will help him become president.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On that note, when I see news covering Cali state worker telework, they love to go to the streets and find everyone they can to interview who's attitude seems to be "fuck you, I can't work from home so you shouldn't either"

I can't help but feel like that's intentional to turn people against remote workers

I mean... Even if they're just selfish assholes, do they not get that traffic is getting worse again because agencies and businesses are forcing return to office? That more people working remote is actually good for people who can't for whatever reason too?

Sorry, tangent; but GN's attitude on this has yet another incredibly frustrating and bad bit of policy from him

I really hope he doesn't run for president, and if he does, that he gets shut down early in the primary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DidIReallySayThat@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why I dont want him as a presidential candidate. 😒 We cant allow people to get hunted down so his chances of winning are better. MAGA wants to force facism upon us and I'm not willing to let establishment dems move their moral compass.

Mark my words, he would NOT hold anyone, including trump, accountable. He and the other paid-fpr establishment dems would say, "Oh, we need to move on as a country." No we don't, we need accountability, STARTING with the dems!

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"We're looking forward not back"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Our next President-apparent. Fucking hell, this is who they're going to run against Vance, aren't they?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's the one money will support but there is precedent for that to not matter. See Clinton v Obama, Jeb v Trump and various smaller races.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 9 points 1 month ago

^please clap^

[–] unspeakablehorror@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 month ago

Thankfully he is not favored currently, but its very close. I can promise you I will gladly devote a chunk of my life to volunteering for a candidate running against him in the primaries, to keep him out of the white house. Send him back to the Napa vineyards where scum like this belongs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BabyVi@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For someone like Newsom there will never be a right time or manner to implement protections for trans people. And there will always be some clever excuse for which to cling. But when they are called to protect the interests of the powerful, they will break any precident or boundry to achieve those aims.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Basically he said that he thinks this should be left up to the governor, whoever that is, and no matter how righteous and well intentioned, the issue shouldn’t be decided for all time this way, eroding future governors’ authority.

What a spineless position. Why pass any laws at all? Why not leave everything up to the whims of whoever is in office?

Doesn’t the legislature decide issues all the time and enshrine those decisions for the future in law? Isn’t that what they do? Why the fuck should extradition for providing healthcare be any different? Isn’t he “eroding the authority” of the legislature in saying no, we should leave this as governor’s discretion, just in principle?

I’m not just hating Newsom reflexively here. I seriously don’t understand his argument, despite trying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 38 points 1 month ago

Newsom is a neoliberal. Neoliberals are conservatives. He is controlled opposition. He will try to trick the public into believing he is progressive in 2028. He is a pathological liar and conman just like any other conservative.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We can't let him win the primaries. He's probably the one candidate who could keep any Democrats home.

[–] gagcar@lemmus.org 9 points 1 month ago

Joe Biden Roombas back onto a debate stage after bumping into several walls

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 30 points 1 month ago

They hate you and want you to die.

(Repeat until it sinks in)

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago

So he vetoed the “You can’t hunt down doctors across state lines because they gave trans people health care” law, because it… “sets a bad precedent”.

How about the precedent of not hunting down doctors for… being doctors…???

How about the precedent of not being insane fascists?????

[–] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And I thought he was coming around on transgender rights, sigh Fuck you Newsom

[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Charlie Brown moment, it happens.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have no idea what the red line is for "leftists" defending this guy both as governor and a presidential candidate.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 month ago (28 children)

Do people who call themselves leftists support him?

[–] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I can't wait to get yelled at by democrats when i refuse to vote for this shit head in a few years.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hopefully he doesn’t make it past the primaries. Unfortunately if he does and he’s up against a MAGA Republican, there’s only one clear choice.

Go help campaign for progressive candidates before the primaries! Come November 2028, it may be too late.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Just one more neolib bro! We'll get someone worth a damn, you just gotta support one more shithead I promise!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is why I don't want him to run for president. He is not a progressive.

[–] Postimo@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 month ago

I mean this isn't even just not progressive, this is collaboration with fascist states to do fascism.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (30 children)

Hey liberal dems, great job at losing the queer vote.

bUt ItS sTiLL beTTeR tHAn GoP

No, we have third parties. I wouldn’t trust anyone that throws me under the bus, in a dumb attempt to score points with voters that would never vote that candidate in the first place.

Fuck fascism. This is how we succumb to fascism. Liberal politicians try to appease fascists.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Yggnar@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

"Governor vetoes bill that would limit the powers of the Governor."

I'm so shocked.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Definitely won’t have my vote in the primaries.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who needs the GOP when the dems are like this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 14 points 1 month ago

I sincerely hope that a progressive governor replaces this shitbird. Newsom might be better than any given member of the GOP, but that bar is in hell.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 14 points 1 month ago

The Democratic party has put us in this position and for that, they have my deepest disappointment.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, the lead sponsor of the bill, noted 18 governors have “signed identical provisions into law without fanfare”

DNC voters when they let this guy through and lose again:

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Let's hope for a veto override.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

What a fucking cuck

[–] EbenezerScrew@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Get fucked Gavin.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Blue Nazi DNC wants amekos to vote for.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago

He wants to be your president, wooooo! Asshole. Tried to force state workers back to the office, too.

[–] modestmeme@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

His official explanation:

“While I share the author's views on the importance of protecting these important healthcare services, extradition is an exclusively executive function. When discretionary, that discretion is appropriately placed with the Governor. I am troubled by the precedent that would be set if an outgoing administration agreed with the Legislature to erode the executive authority of an incoming Governor based on their shared policy preferences, regardless of how righteous and well-intended those actions may be.”

He doesn’t want to set the precedent that such actions can be mandated in advance by an outgoing administration.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good thing! If there's anything Republicans all respect, it's precedent and norms and settled laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pamparana@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This guy is also horrible but the bar is so low these days.... The democratic party is also responsible for the mess we are in. They stopped being a party of the people long time ago. Need to purge the Schumers, Pelosis and Newsoms.

load more comments
view more: next ›