Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Believe it or not, the better stance than sucking up to fascists and surrendering to trans annihilation is to literally not even talk about the trans community at all. Its better to not even engage in the conversation than to call for their annihilation.
These mother fuckers already wanted to kill off trans people. Appealing to fascists is just an excuse. They themselves are fascists.
I don’t think James Talarico wants to see trans people rounded up and killed.
The Roosevelt coalition that passed the New Deal included everyone from Communist sympathizers to Southern white supremacists.
To be successful, the Democratic Party needs to be a big tent.
In North Carolina, Roy Cooper is campaigning by promising to crack down on crime. In Michigan, Democrats are running Dr. Abdul El Sayed, who is a progressive. In Kansas, the candidate is a megachurch pastor. In Nevada, Jacky Rosen is pro-Israel. In Georgia, Jon Ossoff criticized the defund the police movement.
What matters isn’t that these people agree on every issue. What matters is that they agree on taxing corporations, improving healthcare and holding Trump accountable
Elections are a game of addition, not subtraction. Forcing purity tests alienates independent voters who might otherwise support the party on core issues.
Yep, best to just say fuck all the trans people, it's a big tent and you're not in it. Sorry charlie, should have been born right. The big tent says trans bad, after all. Best to cater to the lies people have been fed about us. Vote blue no matter who!
Once trans people are banned from sports up to and including chess for their obvious (read: unproven) advantages and children are denied medically necessary healthcare, everyone will surely just let us live happily from there.
How common of an issue is transgender in sports actually?
This seems like one of those distractions from the Epstein files I keep hearing about
In actual sports?
.002% (10/500,000) of US college athletes
In the minds of Idiot America?
It's very much an outsized concern. 73% of Americans were uncomfortable with transgender athletes competing on sports teams that do not match their sex at birth. and even in the Democratic party,
Democrats are more divided on the issue. A slim majority (55%) said they would be not too or not at all comfortable with athletes playing on teams that do not match their birth sex, while smaller shares said they would be somewhat comfortable (21%) or extremely or very comfortable (23%).
Despite there being statistically few transgender athletes, unjustly barring them from sports cements a perception that it's also acceptable (and under the current administration, encouraged) to discriminate against them across society as a whole.
There is also insignificant scientific evidence that trans athletes have any meaningful advantage.
A lot of trans people, me included, are bad at making doctor’s appointments, let alone anything strenuous and witnessed.
How to increase your chance of losing
You need to leave your local college campus.
In a place like Iowa or Kansas, it actually decreases your chance of winning.
Americans were bombarded with Trump ads lambasting Kamala Harris for having endorsed free gender-transition surgery for prisoners and immigration detainees.
What makes this all so maddening is that those obstacles were placed there by well-meaning progressives.
The Trump ad describes an answer Harris gave on an ACLU candidate questionnaire five years ago. (“As President will you use your authority to ensure that transgender and nonbinary people who rely on the state for medical care — including those in prison and immigration detention — will have access to comprehensive treatment associated with gender transition, including all necessary surgical care?” Answer: yes.).
I’m sure neither the ACLU nor the Harris staffers who cooperated in this response set out to seed Republican attack ads. Yet a large portion of the work of the progressive nonprofit complex is functionally dedicated to this very outcome.
Americans are broadly supportive of equal rights for trans people. That support does not quite extend to allowing trans athletes to compete in women’s sports, or to medicalizing transitions for children. Trans Activists pushing Democrats to take incredibly unpopular positions isn't a good thing.
Here is the thing about Republican politicians. A big chunk of their voters don't care they vote against labor rights, cut taxes on big corporations or slash Medicaid/Medicare. Many get elected primarly on cultural issues. They campaign arguing democrats are anti-american anti-police islamic freaks with blue hair. Don't give them ammo to shoot at you.