136
Instagram boss says users will be ‘overwhelmed’ with brand content in algorithm-free world
(www.theguardian.com)
You are concerned that you will make less money
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2026
136 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
7300 readers
51 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What he really means is you'll see more native posts from brands, and not see as many ads, because they hide posts from brands to force them to pay to reach their own followers.
Everyone at Meta can fuck themselves to death
I'll share a short story of how the algorithm sucks. A friend's mom was dying of cancer. I knew it would be within a few days or week. He was texting me a lot - but in random bursts - trying to distract himself from the inevitable. I scrolled through IG, thought I saw it all, and having not heard from him in a while, I texted him something somewhat goofy.
He texted me back, "My mom just died". I had no idea. Sure enough, scroll another 5 minutes and buried at the end of my feed is his post from less than 2 hours ago.
Instagram made me look like a dick because they'd rather show me 26 hour old content, than 2 hour content.
He should have called you with the phone
He had a few more urgent things to handle. I'm sure I would've gotten a call or text hours or a day or so later. But the algorithm decided that it didn't want to show me sad news and would rather send me engagement bait.
So .. people will see the platform for what it really is?
Their real concern must be in the news title, not the fake one:
Cancer cannot into cancer.
Terrible news.
Meanwhile here on the Fediverse/Threadiverse, people are doing fine without an algorithm other than just boosting someone else's post.
And whose fault is that, allowing all that brand content on the platform?
Feed us the cancer, sell us the cure
in an algorithm-free world
What do these people think the word "algorithm" means? Something something dihydrogen monoxide.
Engagement-based content recommendation algorithm. As I am sure you well know.
This is like asking people what they're complaining about when they're complaining about AI. Like yes, the term is very broad and technically encompasses non-neural-network decision making logic, but you know damn well what I'm talking about.
Algorithm means Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi. His name was transliterated into Latin as Algoritmi and from there into English as Algorithm.
Using 'algorithm' to refer to anything other than the person is linguistic drift and therefore utterly unacceptable. Even if you're "pulling an Algorithm" by relying on his mathematical work, then you're pulling an Algorithm every time you use the number zero. Using "(pulling an) Algorithm" to refer only to a structured set of mathematically precise instructions is just so ignorant.
Anyway, what were you saying about people being dumb for using "algorithm" in a different sense than how it was used previously?
"Algorithm" is a term from computer science that doesn't inherently have anything to do with social media or content recommendations. Those things are examples of algorithms, but far from the only ones.
“Algorithm” is a term from computer science
That is an example application of Algorithm's work, but far from the only one. Algorithm doesn't inherently have to do with information theory or programming languages.
Linguistic drift comes for us all. "Eventually everyone who hates this thing is going to be dead, and the ones that use it are going to be in control".
Haha yes all words change meaning. You're so smart for figuring that out.
There's a difference between the two changes though. Most notably the first one doesn't conflict with the name, whereas this new usage which only makes sense within the context of corporate-made social media from the last 15 years.
Not if you dont follow the fucking brands...
The call is coming from i lnside the house. The point of shitty algorithms is to keep you scrolling and accidentally clicking ads
Wouldn’t they only see that if they followed brands? When I left ig a few years back besides the ads every three posts my home feed was just my friends’ posts and I could scroll to the end (all caught up) in 10 or so minutes if I checked it once a day
they would probably still inject ton of ads from brands
Domino's has been doing it for years on Reddit, for example. Lots of "goofy" posts like the Domino's driver dancing on a customers porch because they asked him to through their door-bell camera. Dumb stuff like that.
To say nothing about all the brand discussion about Marvels latest projects on their. 100% Disney is paying for an encouraging that pseudo-advertising behavior.
Actually, funny story, if you post more often actually people find it kind of irritating and they block you
"What ends up happening is the best way to get more reach is just to post more often and those who can afford to post the most often do and then therefore get the most reach,” he said.
“And it turns out your friends post a lot less than creators, who post a lot less than brands and companies.”
Yeah the behavior they're talking about is enabled by their algorithm. Without big brother curating how much of the content makes it to your feed, people just stop following spammy accounts.
It's presented as convenience ("we'll manage that for you") but it's actually manipulative ("we'll tune it to exactly as much as you will tolerate")
Actually, funny story, if you post more often actually people find it kind of irritating and they block you
You are right
You guys still use instagram? 😂😂😂😂
Last time i saw a friend using instagram, about every 3rd post was sponsored... So not much different?
Professional liar says what
It is such an obvious lie
the actual boss is zuckerberg.
Suckaturd
anyone who still uses instagram is likely to be overwhelmed just getting out of bed
Funny take, because they wouldn't be shown branded content AT ALL, unless people voluntarily followed the brands. Then, if those brands spammed everyone's feed and everyone saw it all and it overwhelmed them, then people would unfollow those brands. You would only see what you wanted to see, from the people and organizations you wanted to see it from, and you'd see everything they posted, rather than a black box algorithm choosing what to amplify, what to hide, and what to insert into your feed. No algorithm sounds like heaven.
This says a lot more about their platform management than it does about the value of their algorithm
*Laughing in doesn't use Instagram
Use pixelfed, problem solved.
Pixelfed kind of sucks though and the creator's a dick.
(Not saying you shouldn't leave Instagram or trying to defend them)
It's fine to me. I haven't seen anything bad from the creator. He's a perfectionist, but that just means I have to wait for features, which is fine.
I wanted to like it. I've tried using it a few times over the last few years but the UI always seemed janky and underdeveloped, both in first- and third-party apps . The official app doesn't seem to provide any benefit for posting images over posting to mastodon. The android app used to have an image editor but that had been removed the last time I tried it. I don't really get what the point of it is.
I'd never considered how the algo might actually be improving user experience.
I still haven't considered it, and I never will, but I never had