Bruh they didnt label the trans fat with a percentage because the recommended intake is 0g 💀
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
196
18734 readers
174 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Same for sugar. 266 gr of sugar per liter is and absurd amount of sugar.
26g/100ml is a lot but not that high. A European coke has about 10.6g, energy drinks around 15g, while smoothies and natural juices can go up to 20g.
Twice the amount of sugar of some of the most sugary and damaging drinks available does seem like a lot to me. And about juice, at least some of that is fructose if the juice is actually fruit. This pure refined sugar.
Absolutely true, but I would kind of guess that an actual drink would have a lower sugar content than what is essentially a liquid dessert (for 4 people). Nutella for example is around 50% sugar
You misread the number of grams in the milkshake, I think.
I used the number the previous commentator used. I've now converted the 32 fl.oz (I figure it's US fl.oz.) to Liter, which is 0.96l so I guess the actual content would be something like 28g/100ml which is not that far off my previous statement of 26g/100ml.
Which to clarify is something like 20% sugar content when taking the average density of water and substracting a bit to make up for the higher density of a milk shake.
With the amount of fat in it I'd think the density would be lower than water
Maybe I should have looked that up forst, I kind of figured that since the viscosity of the drink would be lower the density would be higher
... I want one
Americans be eating like they have universal healthcare but we actually do in my country
They kind of suck. That's the real travesty with these franchise crimes against cardiology, it's all cardboard with high fructose corn syrup drizzle.
It tastes good, right, but also... Shallow. Literally just a shitload of sugar and fat, nothing unique to it.
Does it actually taste good though? Sure, ice cream is good. But nearly double the sugar and that ice cream turns into a vile mouth assault.
Well, it's got oreos in it. They're kind of an acquired taste. So your mileage may vary. If you grew up with them you'll probably like it. If not, it depends.
I have never in my life heard someone call a chocolate biscuit an acquired taste.
If that is an acquired taste, literally everything is an acquired taste and we can retire the phrase lmao
I could see Oreos being off putting to folks who have gone most of their lives without them. Easy for them to hook you when you’re young and taste good forever, on the other hand.
It depends on the chocolate. For example, Hersheys are an acquired taste because of the butyric acid.
Crikey. You could run a marathon after that and still have a calorie surplus. Is this actually real?!
MILK WAS A BAD CHOICE