this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
99 points (97.1% liked)

Shitposting

90 readers
1071 users here now

Welcome to !shitposting@lemmy.today — a place for memes, shitposts, absurdity, cursed images, low-effort masterpieces, and whatever other internet garbage makes you laugh.

Post dumb shit. Upvote dumb shit. Don't take dumb shit too seriously.

founded 5 days ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JayDee@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

So we've mentioned a couple of reasons so far which I'll list:

  • we want launch sites on the coast rather than inland so anything the detatches from the ship falls harmlessly into the ocean
  • it's more costly to build a launch site on a mountain where you have to transport everything up and down the slopes.

I think it's also important to point out that even the tallest mountains only reach less than 10,000 meters above sea level, and the lowest satellite in low earth orbit is approximately 160 km above the earth's surface. So you'd be doing all that work on a mountain top with more unpredictable weather and harsher navigation just to trim off less than 10 % of the fuel you need to get to LEO.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

She asked a question because she wanted to learn more. Batman is being a dick because he wants to feel better about himself. Be more like Akai.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 46 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't punish curiosity, not even in adults.

[–] Westcoastdg@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I'm aligned in principle, but to be fair, curiosity would have been searching the Internet, posting on social media without a research attempt is performative

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I dunno if this is so obvious that nobody has mentioned it, but they launch near the equator because that is where the earth spins the fastest, and the rocket is already loaded up with a proportional amount of angular momentum to carry into space with it. Therefore, less fuel is required to get the rocket into space.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago

Mostly true. Not for polar orbit launches, where you have to expend propellant to cancel out that angular momentum. For that you want a northern or southern launch site with a clear zone to the north or south.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So why don't they launch from Mount Chimborazo (a tall mountain near the equator, and the furthest point on Earth's surface from its center), then? Checkmate, atheists! \s

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Another important thing is where you launch over. Most launch sites are close to the ocean so that any discarded boosters dont land on cities or towns, or in case something goes wrong during launch and the rocket falls back to earth like a bomb.

This all is meaningless if you're China, because China doesnt give a shit and will launch directly over small villages (https://spacenews.com/china-launches-sino-french-astrophysics-satellite-debris-falls-over-populated-area/)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

In addition to being on the wrong (i.e., uprange) side of a continent, Mount Chimborazo is also in freakin' Ecuador (which is not exactly known for its aerospace industry), is 30 km from the nearest town, is covered in glaciers, and -- just for shits 'n giggles -- is an active stratovolcano. My question was very much tongue-in-cheek.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Authorities are understood to issue warnings and evacuation notices for areas calculated to be at risk from launch debris, reducing the risk of injuries

From the article.

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

And multiple times have either failed to do that, or the people did not listen. Causing fatalities.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Having a launch site inland is asking for trouble if anything goes wrong. Nobody likes having rocket stages dropped on their head. That's why launch sites tend to be on the coast. On top of that, a rocket launch requires a lot of logistics. That means you'd have to lug a lot of stuff up a mountain and build all the infrastructure to do it, like roads. That would make the launches way more expensive. A rocket launch is a major industrial undertaking so having the necessary infrastructure at hand is a huge advantage.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Having a launch site inland is asking for trouble if anything goes wrong. Nobody likes having rocket stages dropped on their head.

That's why I set up all my launch sites on the West Coast of countries!

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago

We gonna build a big-ass ramp up the side of Everest and Evel Kneivel our way into orbit!

[–] mossberg590@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Debris falling on people is too costly. Accidents, aborted flights, and spent first stage rockets are too much liability.

[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 25 seconds ago

Not in China!

[–] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We should launch those from space.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

That's actually NASAs Artemis/Luna Gateway mission plans via Musks/SpaceX. The idea being to have one rocket that brings people/fuel into orbit, then a second rocket that just transfers them and takes them on further.

All the talk of "heavy lift vehicles" was for transports which would carry massive amounts of fuel.

Destin from Smarter Every Day on YouTube gave a talk at NASA saying it won't work.

Personally I think a planet spraying and exploding kerosene fueled space vehicles into the atmosphere when climate change, world hunger amd housing are still problems is perverse. The stuff of a pathological mental illness.

[–] christopher@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I imagine the cost to build a facility and get the rocket on a mountain would be higher

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Maybe for the first one.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

The answer is money.