this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
529 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87712 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 56 points 6 days ago

It pretty much makes privacy illegal.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 64 points 6 days ago (52 children)

That privacy was already long gone by the time of this case.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2232

(a)Destruction or Removal of Property To Prevent Seizure.—
Whoever, before, during, or after any search for or seizure of property by any person authorized to make such search or seizure, knowingly destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of preventing or impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take such property into its custody or control or to continue holding such property under its lawful custody and control, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

If he hadn't used duress and had just refused, he'd have been fine. Graphine is secure and would have had his back

If he hadn't given them the code and instead left it in his wallet, and they did it themselves, he'd have been fine.

All he had to do was plead the 5th.

He's going to get hit with a felony for destroying data to prevent a search. There are tons of precedents in the 11th Circuit for searching without a warrant.

A duress password is only useful if what you'd be facing is worse than 18 U.S. Code § 2232a, and then only if they don't have enough to convict you already.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2rokxux5cU`___`

Dude is just protesting the construction of a large cop training facility near him. I don't know what the fuck he did to get on the FBI radar, but I wish him good luck; he's gonna need it.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 77 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't know what the fuck he did to get on the FBI radar

....

Dude is just protesting the construction of a large cop training facility near him.

That is what did it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't think ordinary citizens should be required to know the law in lawyer-like detail when they travel.

I think in the broad strokes, you're probably right about his legal situation, but it suuuuuucks and it's not what I think of when I hear the word "freedom," for sure.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Freedom, lol. How many prisoners per capita again?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 60 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Advice: if you know you don´t want your phone searched going through customs, don't bring it! Or wipe it before you go through. I'm 100% on this guy's side, but we're not exactly living in a free and open society.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 6 days ago (5 children)

This isn't new. Journalists coming into the US in the aughts would be harassed by CBT and DHS, forced to open and unlock their laptops (and then delete whatever the officers found unsavory.

So they'd come in with their computers fully encrypted and wouldn't have the pass key, themselves, so it was impossible to unlock them. If they were detained unreasonably, that became a new story the next morning.

Once through customs, correspondents would call their office and get the key.

But it sucks if you don't have a whole news agency to back your rights.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Seriously. Wipe it, claim it's new to you or whatever, put your stuff back on later if you need to. I'm sure you can find somewhere or someone you trust to get you that data back whenever you actually need it.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 days ago (8 children)

It brings up an interesting question: if wiping your phone after being requested access to it is illegal (?), would wiping your phone in anticipation of access being requested also illegal? Are we effectively required to give the federal government access to every private account in order to travel?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 54 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

You know, since we are entering into a lot of legal weirdness here, how about this:

You give the cops TWO passwords. You tell them one is the duress password, and the other is the password that will unlock the phone.

Desperate and without a warrant, they try one. Wrong try! Phone is wiped.

In reality, both are duress passwords but they would have to prove that. (GoS only currently supports one duress password)

Yes, it's ridiculous, but everything about this is ridiculous.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 67 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Nah, write the duress password on a piece of paper and keep it in your phone case. Then keep your mouth shut. Let the cops find it and try it themselves.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago

Then you sue them for destroying your data. They took your phone and wiped it...

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes! Or even better, make it 1234 or your birthdate and let them guess it on their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] droppedtacos@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And what about maybe also adding in a friend or relative that's with you so that you can inform the cop that one of you tells only truths and one of you tells only lies. I think we're onto something here. 'Dispatch, I'm gonna need the Riddlemaster to come down here. We got another one.'

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 42 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I think what he did was brave and I think there's a good chance he loses this, and I think the guilty verdict will be really unpopular

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Someone has to fall on their sword to get important issues brought before the supreme court but I wouldn't get my hopes up with this court.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

Jury nullification is a thing for reason.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm inclined to think he's going to get away with it, but more because of the circumstances under which he provided the password, as in prolonged detention where he was specifically denied access to a lawyer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zane@infosec.pub 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's an easy legal loophole.

When you seize their phone, tell them your passcode is explicitly not the destruction code, and do not answer any more questions besides insisting this.

When they inevitability try to put in the only thing you mentioned, its entirely their fault for the erase.

Your milage may vary depending on financial class.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

When you seize their phone, tell them your passcode is explicitly not the destruction code, and do not answer any more questions besides insisting this.

I feel like there might be a couple of things you have the the wrong way around in this sentence.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›