no_more_slop

91 readers

19 users here now

NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI NO AI

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

honesthenery@thelemmy.club

Prompt Monkey: When AI creates the Illusion of Technical Skill (www.linkedin.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by mr_blue@thelemmy.club to c/StopAI@thelemmy.club

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some people are dumb enough to confuse competency with merely following AI instructions, without thinking deeply about the problem.

For this reason, I wrote the article "Prompt Monkey: When AI creates the Illusion of Technical Skill "

And what do you think about it? Agree or disagree? Share your comments below.

(Alternative link: https://oupsz.github.io/prompt-monkey/ )

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The following sentence contradicts the rest of the article:

In his view, AI was merely a tool, not an agent capable of analysing context and reaching rational conclusions. That was where I disagreed

It is a tool, and there is no analysis.

[–] mr_blue@thelemmy.club -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Dude, could please elaborate a bit further? Like, which part of the rest of the article do you think this contradicts?

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If I understand what you mean, the title says "AI has no technical skills" (which I agree with) but the sentence "... That was where I disagreed" implies that you think "AI is capable of analysing context and reaching rational conclusions" which is weird because AI is a tool that does not think at all, cannot think or analyze by its own definition.

[–] mr_blue@thelemmy.club -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Dude, you should read the first few paragraphs first because I contextualize what I meant by "Illusion of Technical Skill" I'm not referring to AI faking Technical Skill, but people not thinking by themselves and using AI to do so.

Stating what is already in the article that if you read it, you will find:

"However, even if an LLM is not able to understand a situation as a human would, that doesn’t make it irrelevant to the discussion about technical competence. A system does not need consciousness to perform part of a cognitive task. If the AI identifies the vulnerability, chooses the tools, generates the commands, interprets the errors and decides the next step, then most of the problem-solving process came from the AI, not from the user. Therefore, the important question is not whether the AI is truly thinking. The important question is: How much thinking is still done by the person using it?”"*

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can you please post the article here instead of linking to a site that lots of people refuse to use?

[–] mr_blue@thelemmy.club -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

dude, you're actually have a great point. On 4chan, they already would tell me to kill myself, I'm very glad that you're civilized around here, without irony.

But it's also important to notice that the link allows people to read the article without even logging on the platform.

I'm not asking them to join Linkedin, but I get why some people don't like it.

[–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 weeks ago

Linkden is a seedy site that has malicious javascript. Thank you for posting a alternative link. 🫡

[–] mr_blue@thelemmy.club -3 points 2 weeks ago

Now, I edited the post and shared the Git Pages where people now can read without click on Linkedin. Thanks, pal !

[–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 weeks ago

I call em prompturdz