this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
50 points (98.1% liked)

PC Gaming

12948 readers
549 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Streetlights@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Insane engineering. The diameter of a silicon atom is about 0.2nm for context.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Its magic. Can't believe we have the technology to do so.it does mean we're fast approaching the hard limit where new innovations will have to be made beyond making the electronics smaller and more dense.

[–] Tacoma@feddit.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While it is magic, and great engineering, it is also 'just' marketing, as in, actual physical features are not 1.6nm but more around 20nm, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_nm_process

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Wait, so everything since 22nm has been just marketing hype?

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting read!

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps photonic processors will be the next big thing. But that's still well in the future.

It's also bullshit as it has no bearing on the actual properties of the chips. Manufacturers use these as product names. Here's an article discussing it.

https://www.pcgamesn.com/amd/tsmc-7nm-5nm-and-3nm-are-just-numbers