this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
153 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30937 readers
2541 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President orders Pentagon to scale back ‘inappropriate and hostile’ exercises with South Korea Andy Burnham exchanged messages with someone impersonating Donald Trump’s chief of staff, the Guardian understands. The UK prime minister was in contact with an unknown individual pretending to be the senior White House aide Susie Wiles before concerns were raised about the incident. No messages of significance were sent and the suspicious activity was quickly reported to the appropriate authorities, it is underst...

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most likely an excuse to cover pulling more equipment/manpower from the area to throw at the failing Iran war.

[–] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 15 points 1 week ago

This was exactly my thought as well

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Well done USA. this is why democracies around the world don't trust you anymore.
I wonder who Americans will elect next? Maybe J. D. Vance or Pete Hegseth? Unless of course they can find someone even more crazy. 😬

It's absolutely insane that USA isn't even moderately on the side of democracy anymore. But instead favor enemies of democracy, and have themselves become an enemy to democracy too.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can just call it “the American Regime.” We’ve been that way a long time if anyone stands in the way of corporate profits, or capitalism… but now we’re just mask off fully because we have an idiot in charge.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There used to be a synergy between supporting freedom democracy and having the economy thrive on it.
USA is now disregarding and throwing overboard everything that made USA the world leader with the most allies of any country ever.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which supporting freedom democracy did we support? Are you just not counting the socialist and communist democracies our CIA overthrew and installed a pro capitalist dictator?

Believing the USA was ever a “freedom democracy” supporter is pure delusion.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You are very very wrong.
When they liberated Europe and the world in WW2 from the axis powers together with England, Canada and many other allies, there is no doubt USA supported freedom and democracy. And even granted the conquered countries their freedom.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So USA’s identity stems from 1945 years ago after a world war, and not the other most recent 80 years of despicable, anti democratic behavior?

I fail to see how that’s not completely delusional.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Which supporting freedom democracy did we support?

You just wrote in past tense, giving me the freedom to use the most obvious example that you are wrong.

Believing the USA was ever a “freedom democracy” supporter is pure delusion.

Here you even use EVER, further legitimizing my point.
You are moving the goal post, and absolutely USA has been helping democracies like for instance South Korea and Taiwan a lot, even Japan could be included in that list. And the formation of NATO to protect democracies against Soviet Union and now Russia is also an example.
Trump is not a NATO supporter, he is on the contrary trying to destroy it. And NATO is absolutely created with the main objective to defend democracies on both sides of the Atlantic.

[–] blastosist@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let’s not forget that it’s not “Americans “ it’s some Americans

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, and these Americans who it is not, are relevant to this how?
you only have 1 government, and that's the 1 Americans elected, and ALL Americans are part of USA and American civilization.
Meaning that even if they disagree with the government, they are part of the economy, workforce and society the government control.

I sympathize with every American that voted against Trump, and tried to prevent this, and those that have demonstrated against him. But unfortunately it doesn't change what USA currently is to the rest of the world, and how we need to relate to USA as a country.

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Don't worry the Dems will appoint the most evil Neo-Lib possible and make sure no one comes out to vote for them and ensuring another Republican government.

wait, that's not a good option

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He is an irredeemable piece of shit.

[–] Saffire@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Yeah and Kim Jong Un sucks too.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“trump legitimizes a dictator. Again.”

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

The tankies have something in common with Trump then, huh.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Can this stupid motherfucker just die already

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

No puppet . . no puppet . . . you're the puppet

[–] savvie@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

ghouls of a feather…

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Iran should take notes. The best time to develop nukes was twenty years ago. The second best time is now. One missile aimed at the Epsteini capital and you too can have a 'very good relationship'.

[–] theand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Check Polymarket for bets on NK invading SK.

If there's a bet, you know that he's gonna make money from it and it'll most likely be announced.