this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
209 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30868 readers
2170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Naval families with loved ones deployed for months on US warships amid the Iran war have reacted with fury to Donald Trump and the defense secretary Pete Hegseth’s dismissal of their concerns about the extreme pressures and dire conditions they are enduring.

The Guardian has talked to three naval families who have been following the physical and mental stresses bearing down on their relatives with mounting alarm. The families, with loved ones on board the USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Tripoli, all spoke anonymously for fear of retribution against their active duty relatives.

They spoke of insufficient nourishment that has led to close relatives losing 20-30lbs in weight since they were sent to the Middle East five months ago, leaving one sailor “emaciated”, according to his mother. They spoke also of low-quality drinking water and scarce mental health counseling and support despite the intense burden of being at sea for months on end without making land.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If Trump calling veterans "losers" didn't stop people from supporting him, what what would be different this time around?

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This negative angle has to be minimized before the loudest supporters are actually just the loudest detractors.

More are leaving that orange moron every day, and will continue to do so.

Just the fact he doesn’t understand “pool” was something many people from many walks of life could comprehend and put in a context of just how idiotic he is.

Now, more physical evidence of his ineptitude.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All the families should be going to the media.

It's really funny how much the US is turning into North Korea.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago

I'm waiting for news of the sailors who are telling and showing this information to the public getting thrown in the brig and on the fast track to Leavenworth. Chasing and punishing whistleblowers is one of the Trump regime's favorite pastimes.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You mean the guy who mocked John McCain for being a P.O.W. doesn't respect military vets?

Ya don't say

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So, they're starving our sailors? What the actual fuck?!!! He's talking about his almost a billion dollar renovation and he's starving our sailors? I'm beyond angry on this.

They spoke of insufficient nourishment that has led to close relatives losing 20-30lbs in weight since they were sent to the Middle East five months ago,

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago

They will still continue to support him. Most military personnel voted for Trump. They get what they deserve

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Going off statistics, the vast majority of these sailors, and their families, got exactly what they voted for.

I don't want to hear from a single parent now, who didn't also speak out after their precious whittle babies murdered 175 school-girls, or the countless other civilians the USN killed during its most recent warcrime speed.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What are those statistics btw?

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That 65% voted for President Trump.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Of people in the military?

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Give the odds, how do those families feel about their Trump votes now? Got what you voted for!!!

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

I don't know why those suckers and losers aren't happy to be treated this way. Anyone who was in the American military and voted for Trump is/was a literal simp.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Yeah... Military and veterans voted 61 percent for Trump and MAGA. You get what you stupidly voted for.

Enjoy the day you voted for!

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Fascist soldiers that support genocide are starving? Anyway...