this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
138 points (100.0% liked)

World News

57953 readers
1354 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 63 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’ve taken no public money

Letting politicians accept private funding is arguably worse, as it beholds them to private interests.

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

He knows this. The phrase is deliberate misdirection.

[–] ivan@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

What’s funny is that politicians job would be to get salary from public money to represent public will.

So that’s an admission of willing to say whatever for money from whoever, hence why this bastard loves Russia and Israel among other things.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago

So the joke candidate lost and Count Binface won, exactly as predicted.

[–] HappyCatLuvs_U@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

I've heard Count Binface is saying there was confusion at the polls. Voters could not tell the candidates apart as both are filled with garbage.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And here's the thing that a lot of short minded people missed.

Count Binface was never going to win, but that was never the point. If you seriously thought that. Then you need to get your head checked.

The entire point, was to make a farce out of Farage's grandstanding.

That's why no major party ran, the probe would happen anyway.

And guess what, it worked.

Count Binface was everywhere going into this election and everywhere coming out of it.

Binface won.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Binface got a quarter of the votes, no? That's not nothing.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

A quarter of the votes and the vast majority of the coverage.

International media covered the election. Not because of Farage and his politics. But because a man with a bin for a face is running.

Binface stole the spotlight from Farage's stunt.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Farage also faced criticism for failing to turn up to the Clacton count in Essex, saying he had been told by police of an organised attempt at disruption

Maybe the could have snuck him in a catering truck.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Put him in a pot of slowly boiling water. That frog-faced fucker would have thought he was in a jacuzzi.

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, this whole thing sounds like another Trumpian story where everyone goes "it's all over for him now" and he just keeps chugging along.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The guy was being investigated for corruption so dropped his seat and triggered this circus. And they voted for him again.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Same as trump. He mismanaged the pandemic to the tune of about 800.000 excess deaths, plus all the other crimes, and he won even bigger the second time. Despite what echo chambers on lemmy tell us, people out the really support these clowns.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, they like the ideas. Those ideas feel right to them. And consequences of those ideas, because most don't work in practice, get blamed on the implementation, ideally blamed on some scape goat. Then they'll vote for the next one promising those ideas.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Trickle down economics. Aaaany day now...

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

There actually was not a real chance. As said all other candidates stepped down. By winning he just hands himself back in for investigation and if or when found guilty teller he will have to step down. It’s better than martyring him.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

The Brits are famous for self-loathing.