this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
8 points (90.0% liked)

Fauxmoi

299 readers
3 users here now

The Lemmy gossip sub.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A California appellate court sided with Leviss on Wednesday, refusing to overturn a lower court’s ruling from July 2024 that found Madix’s alleged conduct, as outlined in Leviss’ February 2024 lawsuit, was neither protected speech nor a matter of public interest.

The claims against Madix center on allegations she improperly obtained and shared sexually explicit videos of Leviss that she found on Sandoval’s phone. In a prior declaration filed in the case, Madix acknowledged she secretly accessed Sandoval’s phone without his knowledge or permission and copied the FaceTime videos of Leviss while inside a women’s bathroom stall.

Madix has said she only sent snippets of the intimate video directly to Leviss the night she discovered the recordings. She said she was distraught and wanted to confront her VPR co-star over her alleged affair with Sandoval conducted behind Madix’s back. The affair later became a major storyline on the reality TV show and was widely dubbed “Scandoval.”

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Revenge porn should not be considered protected speech.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It seems like it would be pretty easy for a defense attorney to show that you didn’t send the video to anyone but Leviss (assuming she’s got a pretty mainstream understanding of digital privacy), so the fact that they’re trying to draw this out suggests they can’t do that.

If it was just sent to Leviss, it’s fucked up, but it doesn’t feel like revenge porn to me. That said, she didn’t delete the video herself, so I don’t think she needs the benefit of the doubt here that she wouldn’t have sent them further.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It’s that Maddox sent the video to herself after accessing Sandoval’s cell phone without permission that is problematic to me.

There’s no way to know who she showed the video to from her phone after sending it to herself.

Add on that Sandoval did not inform that he would be recording and saving their video call.