this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
109 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

87315 readers
3382 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So am I right I'm guessing all these tools want closed Internet, where they own all the meaningful compute? That way you can rent access to information they control on a device they own? I feel like it's all one big attempt to corner the market.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's pretty much what I've been expecting, if not as an outright intention certainly an eventuality.

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

I think this has existed as an intentional goal for a long time, albeit from another point of view. I'm thinking of like the piracy days of early 2000, then there was talk about how to lock down devices to prevent any sort of copying of media. The discussion sort of died when Spotify came. But I'm worrying that this development will trigger a reemergence of such a goal. As your self built computer will be more and more expensive, a new possibilty may open up to sell prebuilts that are more locked down. Similarly to how Android is moving from a more open device to a locked down one. HDMI forum locking down their protocols. This may become reality for your general purpose computer. Companies controlling compute and media streaming have a similar motive here, if they do set their mind to it to have this as a fully intentional goal... sigh

[–] db2@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is why I'm not upgrading my am4 machine, AMD.

You've lost the fucking plot.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago

As long as the cash comes streaming in, they don't care.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

More circular financing. Definitely a sign that everything is going great.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This isn’t circular financing. They will sell more than they’ll invest and that money does not disappear when the bubble pops.

[–] chaitae3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's not circular, but it is unclear under which conditions and when Anthropic will pay for the servers, as they don't have enough money right now. The article says that they intend to lease some of the servers, but also that AMD will provide a "financial backstop". It seems to me AMD is taking all the risk to get a foothold in the industry.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 9 points 3 weeks ago

In this economy is that like 2 or 3 computers?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Anthropic's still considered a startup? I'd have thought that they would be too big for that.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

They’ll be a startup until they start making a profit (if)

[–] BouteilleBrune@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"I need more power"

-Claude

[–] cenariodantesco@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's exactly the right instinct -- requiring more power is smart here, and honestly the best choice.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not greedy — it's smart.

[–] cenariodantesco@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You're right to pushback -- and this level of freedom and empowerment is exactly what we need

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I hope it means that AMD is going to be more competitive on the parallel compute front. That'd put pressure on Nvidia to bring their prices down.

Righr now, Nvidia is able to charge an awful lot, because there's little by way of alternatives.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

Intel is starting to show some fight too. Not much, but the B70 isn’t a bad offering for the right use case.

Problem is NVIDIA has a complete stack on offer. Hardware (all the HW, not just the GPUs), networking and software stack are all tightly integrated. They didn’t do it overnight - they bought Mellanox awhile back, and Cumulus a little after that. That got them Infiniband & Ethernet products. It’s pretty impressive, and it’s a pretty big hill for the competition to compete with. Still, there’s hope.