this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
12 points (83.3% liked)

cute dogs, cats, and other animals

11924 readers
1 users here now

founded 6 years ago
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago

"The animals were not in any of the images."

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, IDGAF if someone is masturbating in my home, as long as they follow two rules: clean it up, and no pictures of my home. That's just rude as fuck for even a guest, much less someone that's being paid to primarily pay attention to the animals. You can't actually do both and do them right.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On top of that, I would also be concerned about personal/private information potentially being published if they're careless about what's in the background of their footage.

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

If the Onlyfans model isn't stripping out exif data already they have larger problems than pissing off the person they're dogsitting for.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Good point. Like SolOrion hinted, I hope they strip EXIF.

But if not, when some babysitter takes a video and an expensive item is visible in it, a savvy thief might target it.