I want to read this, but it said "slammed" so... I guess I won't then.
Click-bait.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
I want to read this, but it said "slammed" so... I guess I won't then.
Click-bait.
Seriously. Internet news and media is just such a ridiculously stupid shitshow.
You're not missing much. Moron is wrong yet again.
Here have a free gift link to the article
Original post is a gift link. I'm pretty active about using them
The usage of "slammed" in headlines has "rocketed".
I decided that's on me, for not blocking OP who constantly offers up such content that I don't want to see. Fortunately that's easy to rectify. (Unfortunately it throws out some good content as well but... c'est la vie.)
Conservatives think they can pick and choose science like they do their garbage religion
Can people please stop linking to the NYT like it is a credible source?
It seems the orange pedo chimp attacks anything that holds truth, morality, legality or scientific validity.
Those are four defining points of facism.

For a guy who had COVID so bad he needed a team of scientists and doctors, he's got a strange way of showing gratitude.
Those doctors and scientists don't pay bribes. The fossil fuels industry does
there is no debate about this. you guys just make stuff up based on what you want. it has no basis in reality. ugh I hate this.
Thx for sharing nyt propaganda