this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
39 points (97.6% liked)

UK Politics

5591 readers
77 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RubberDuck@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Asked about wealth taxes on Wednesday, Burnham told the footballer turned podcaster Gary Lineker: “I don’t want to come in and sort of, if you like, create new divisions and pitch people one against another.”

Just keep the old divisions of pitching people against each other

He added: “I do believe we need a greater sense of fairness and people feeling that things are being done in the right way and a fair way.

People want actual fairness but not just a sense of it

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago

Well, then, between this, his declared plan to not only not sack, but to promote Mahmoud, and his non-apology apology over Gaza, it looks like the Greens are the least bad option.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

"Will nobody think of the billionaires' feelings?"

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 8 points 1 week ago

"For now" as if hes going to get a second term.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Starmer II: The Burnham Boogaloo.

[–] Squeezer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Blairite 2: public/private fuckaroo?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's all speculation he hasn't actively told any press anything definitive, as soon as he does it's going to be headline news.

Which is driving them nutty as there's nothing to report and the press is already salty over not getting a labour leadership campaign over the summer.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

don't worry at least he has shabana mahmood completing her hitler arc as chancellor.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

And this is exactly the kind of reason for the change. Wealth tax out, Palantir in, the people who fund the political parties are happy.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Can i just bash my head into a wall at this point?

[–] oeuf@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Fine. I won't vote for Labour then.

[–] GandalftheBlack@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

To no one's surprise