The answer depends upon the ambient humidity
Climate
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Aren't passive homes objectively the best option? Not a claim (I don't know shit about this)
Build it partially underground - earth sheltered building. ex. underground basement. Use good thermal insulation materials.
Is this a quote from a source?
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_solar_building_design
Yes my bad I forgot link.
Those fake window shutters look so weird
I have a south Florida home. Half is build on slab, half over a crawlspace. The crawlspace half is easier to cool with ac (which the home predates) but has annoying humidity problems that are hard to fix with ac (we had to seal and ventilate it with inside air, which eliminates its main utility). So while I don’t disagree with the overall point of the article, that particular example isn’t really a good one.
Adobe makes for good insulation. It delays heat transfer so the heat during the day is held, keeping it cool, and then slowly released during the night, keeping it warm. Air conditioning without emissions.
Sprawl can screw this up though - in Arizona, adobe used to be great. But now in Phoenix the large amounts of concrete mean the desert doesn't cool off at night, and so you don't get any time to release.
Basically people either shouldn't live in the desert, shouldn't pour large amounts of concrete, or need to unify cooling a la Arcosanti.
return to rammed earth