this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)

Wild Feed

564 readers
146 users here now

A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.

Tag if needed:

[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.

[Month and/or year] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.

[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.

[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.

[Archive link in post] — For paywalls and account sign-ins, link the main article in the URL, paste the archive link in the text body.

*Current means the article contains the most up to date publically available information on the subject, within reason.

*Good quality means the source is reputable with a reasonably clean fact checking record.

Check out !Independent_Media@lemmy.today for independent news from around the world or !indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works for Canadian independent publications.

All communities were created with the goal of increasing media literacy and media pluralism.

Sources posted here include:

https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/

https://www.apa.org/

https://www.bbc.com/

https://www.earth.com/

https://www.theguardian.com/international

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/

https://lithub.com/

https://www.mentalfloss.com/

https://www.newscientist.com/

http://psychologytoday.com/

https://www.thequint.com/

https://www.reuters.com/

https://www.rfi.fr/en/

Icon image by z0r0z on pixabay, depicting a silhouette of a world map on a paint-splattered background.

Banner image by Lucentius on pixabay, depicting crumpled newpapers.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Manipulating Earth’s weather to fix problems might seem like an idea straight out of science fiction and, indeed, could have unintended consequences.

Nevertheless, the authors of a study published yesterday in Science Advances argue that a particular type of geoengineering called marine cloud brightening should be taken seriously in the face of a recurring climate phenomenon called “El Niño.” The approach would be controversial, but computer models indicate its potential to mitigate El Niño’s destructive effects, according to the study.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

Invent the goddamn technology. It’s ‘technically feasible.’ We’re actively working to make this thing compoundingly, exponentially worse every day, and doing nothing to stop it, so let’s give it a fucking try here, team. The odds seem to be in our favor on this one.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We… we created them by artificially manipulating the climate.

[–] etherphon@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it's the magic of the free market lol :(

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If we could just manipulate the climate however we want, why are we not cooling it down to offset the climate change caused by all our CO2 making bullshit?

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Because:

In a separate interview with CNN, David Keith, a geophysicist at the University of Chicago, said that while the study's proof-of-concept is technically possible, “the technology simply doesn’t exist.”

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

One, assholes in charge say nuh-uh it's not hotter shut up nerd.

Two, randos screech about the potential consequences! of geoengineering as if we're not already doing it with a bazillion tons of CO2 for some fucking grim consequences right about now.

Meanwhile we are in fact just talking about making more clouds. A process we can presumably start and stop at our discretion.