this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
529 points (98.4% liked)

Lefty Memes

7165 readers
392 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Try to use alt text or image descriptions to allow for greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We encourage alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.


  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
529
Anon is a centrist (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

In whose fucking universe is MAGA considered a 'moderate right' position????

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

In a Nazi's mind.

[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The bell curve part is fine. It's the correlation between IQ and political orientation that is not. One of the biggest fallacies in life is that being smart automatically makes you a good person. It does not, and it also does not determine your political affiliation.

I guess the curve here is iq is the vertical axis and political orientation is the horizontal axis.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

What Anon felt like after posting that:

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am gonna take a guess and say that he thinks y-axis is the IQ and x-axis is some other random variable like it is a scatter plot except it isn't.

[–] ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

isn't the x axis just political orienration? Probably represented 0-1 or 0-100 0 being right and 1 left of course.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago

yeah in this case it is I was just writing anon's general perspective of such plots

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It is how someone with severe Dunning-Kruger thinks a Bell curve works, though.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

Hey, they are in the top 99% of IQ scores.

[–] musubibreakfast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have a BA in performing arts and a MA in film, I have no idea what a Bell curve does.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Acknowledging that limitation means my previous statement doesn't apply to you.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well for the purposes of understanding this, you don't need to. This post is stupid for so many other reasons. Like any graph your axis have to make sense. You're plotting two pieces of data against each other so you need to know what those two pieces of data are and what their scales are.

But here they're measuring IQ against political leanings. But that doesn't work because political affiliation isn't a scale any more then favourite colour is a scale. IQ is a scale, but the bottom axis is just nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It's not even the good midwit format lol

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Average right wing extremist I've met:

Has never read a book, much less the Bible, despite being a fervent Christian.

Average left wing extremist I've met:

Has actually read books about leftist theory, is willing to debate and have their mind changed. The march I joined a few months ago was basically full of Political Science students from the local university.

Tl;dr: the bell curve up top is accurate, minus the Wojacks.

[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The bell curve is accurate with the way it is drawn but that is probably not what the author intended because the author is on the left side with the right-wing extremists that don't understand how a bell curve works.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh yeah, totally agree.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

In the United States at least I suspect that there won't be many of the centralists because the way US politics works there isn't really a place for them. It's a two-party system so you kind of have to be one thing or the other.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm far more bothered by the left being in the right and the right being on the left.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

You think the fascists are ahead of the curve?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 95 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Checks out, there is clearly more IQ under the middle of the graph.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The centrists took a detour around the part where the IQ is

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What about the far-center?

We call them libertarians

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

The graph gains a z axis, in both directions you get an equally-incoherent far-center

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People who agree with me; SMART

Disagree?: DUM DUMS!

[–] ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i disagree, but I'm dumb, so it must be true.

[–] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Everyone is moderate... in their own mind.

If you poll Democratic Party voters they will tell you they are moderate. If you poll them issue by issue most of them agree with Bernie Sanders, the most radical elected left-wing senator.

I think it stems from a profound lack of political education and decades of political propaganda. People think moderate means 'sensible' and radical means 'unreasonable'.

Of course most people think of themselves as 'sensible' or 'moderate'.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Being the most left wing in the US doesn't make you even remotely extremist.

The US is very right-wing.

Being very left from a US PoV is actually moderate from other places' PoV.

[–] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Everyone is moderate… in their own mind.

I'm not.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you poll ~~Democratic Party~~ voters they will tell you they are moderate. If you poll them issue by issue most of them agree with Bernie Sanders, the most radical elected left-wing senator.

Let's be real here. Back before MAGA was a thing every Republican I knew, and I lived in the deep south so I knew a lot, liked Bernie. If the elite hadn't done everything in their power to kneecap him he would have swept in 2016 and we'd be living in a completely different world today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vegafjord@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sad thing is that this is how most people view politics. This makes sprouts jump to the center when first engaging.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, take away the wojaks and it's accurate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

All policies and political structures should be tested to see their influence on HDI, GDPPP, and environmental impact. Whatever improves people's lives should be kept and whatever doesn't should be ignored. Why have beliefs when we can have knowledge.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago

why have beliefs when we can have knowledge

Do you know how hard people are to manipulate once they have knowledge? We can't go around informing people, it would be anarchy!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Being high iq is dumb

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Anon failed successfully

load more comments
view more: next ›