this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
74 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

86075 readers
3859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago
[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't he just complain about the government taking down Claude 5?

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

Yeah, and do you know why?

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Quick question, does "dangerous" include "known to ignore instructions, creatively circumvent guardrails and find security loopholes around restricted permissions"?

Actually, never mind, I can guess the answer and I won't like it.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't the government block anthropic latest model a couple of weeks ago?

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

Yeah, maybe you should read up on why.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Please, no. The way things have been going the last several years AI somehow wiping humanity out actually seems like one of the best possible futures this timeline can reach.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 12 hours ago

And the CEO of anthropic should be on the board of deciding what AI constitutes a danger. We all know how this goes.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I agree.

Also. because of the way they work and how people use them as a source of information, all LLMs are dangerous.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Best take on this I read was:

“McDonald’s CEO demands ban of burgers cooked at home.”

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 0 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

Dumbest comparsion ive heard in my life.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 2 points 36 minutes ago

You must be very young. Perhaps like many AI bubble boosters you were born yesterday.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 24 points 21 hours ago

Which, conveniently, Anthropic CEO defines as "AI from our competitors."

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

Governments are dangerous

[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago

Like the ones that could potentially take market share from his LLM

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 27 points 23 hours ago

Dangerous? Like stealing mass amounts of intellectual property dangerous? Or polluting the environment to profit off said stealing?

[–] statelesz@slrpnk.net 14 points 22 hours ago

Now this stupid marketing bullshit again.

[–] Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago

No doubt they will add that their competition especially the open source ai is dangerous. They have been lobbying against local open source ai for a while so it's not a surprise

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I swear these ai ceos are one trick ponies. again with this marketing of doom and gloom Anthrophic? really?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Better go door to door asking about illegal AI.