this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
337 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30310 readers
2583 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why do the Republicans and conservatives always act like two things are true:

That, 1) Their ideas are so common sense and just so very overwhelmingly popular with the American people while 2) Try to do speed-runs every time they get any power so they can ram through incredibly unpopular things before anyone can push back while doing everything possible to suppress free and fair elections?

I mean, why the rush to get Donvict's image and name on so much shit ASAP? Same for implementing Project 2025? If these were so popular, they'd have all the time in the world to do these things?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago

Their voters are the former, the politicians are the latter. It's a sick cycle of enabler abuse by authoritarian followers and cluster B sickos

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)
  • "Donald Trump approved just 23 percent of disaster funding requests from states with Democratic governors and Democratic senators, while at the same time, over roughly the same period, states with Republican governors and Republican senators had their [requests approved] 89 percent of the time."

  • "The people of Michigan are in good hands with Trump-endorsed Mike Rogers, who is running for U.S. Senate, and John James for governor." "I just spoke with Congressman Tom Tiffany, who has my complete and total endorsement for governor, and informed him that the great state of Wisconsin has been approved to be given $22.6 million in its disaster declaration request."

Trump is openly framing disaster aid as a political favor tied to his endorsed candidates. he's holding disaster aid hostage untill the state does what trump wants so he can make the senator look like the hero... Instead of creating a system where everyone gets equal protection, he's saying if you don't vote for me, you get less protection... This also creates a dangerous new quid pro quo for how states or voters act, supporting his candidates means they'll get the help they need and suffer less, opposing them means they'll have to pay the price... They also mislead voters saying that candidates (like Tiffany or Rogers) directly secured the aid, because in reality, the decision rests with the federal government, Trump himself...

  • "We should be expecting an all-of-government approach in the coming weeks and months. [...] What we can expect in the coming weeks is a federal government that is focused exclusively on helping Republicans win elections. Period, full stop."

So federal agencies (FEMA, ICE, HHS, etc.) will be put to work to influence elections. So we can expect more aid approved to swing states with competitive races (Michigan, Wisconsin) while denying and withholding it to blue states. They will try potential deployment to manufacture crises (immigration "surges") to rally Republican voters, and strategically deploying health resources and programs, announcing new funding, grants and initiatives to boost the image of republican GOP candidates in swing districs (RFK Jr. campaigning in those same key districts). Even if the programs were already planned or not uniquely tied to Republican efforts, it’s about manufacturing the image of the GOP as the party that "delivers".
They literally use all government resources to punish democratic states, and reward republican states. Sounds authoritarian. I thought power was a tool to make lives better for everyone, instead of power being the endgoal and making sure none can challenge him lol

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

call it what it is... a protection racket and red state welfare. Those are blue state dollars trump's taking to give to the red states who bend the knee

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If we ever do get a Democratic President again, he* should do all the same shit to Republican states. Only, he should be transparent about it: "I am only doing this because Donald Trump set the precedent that it can be done. Send me a bill to constrain Presidential powers, and I will sign it. Also, send me a bill to add 4 more justices to the Supreme Court and I will sign that too, so the corrupt fucks there don't undo it."

* = Yes, it will be a "he". If the last three elections have taught me anything, it's that Americans are too misogynist to elect a woman as President right now. Democrats ran three essentially identical candidates againt Trump after all, and only one won. This is why, if AOC is as smart as I think she is, she will wait 20 years before running for President....

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

a bill to constrain presidential powers doesbt work in our current system. Trump has broken the law, repeatedly, brazenly, and nobody that could stop him has done so. Passing a new law for the next Republican to break will not make that harder or result in any consequences beyond what we have already seen.

Things that might make a difference: 1 permanently expanding the power of majoritarian democracy/the Democratic party. Adding Puerto Rico and DC as states, passing the interstate national popular vote compact in enough states to neuter the electoral college, making political gerrymandering illegal nationwide.

  1. Prosecuting the criminals in the current administration, all of them, top to bottom, thousands of cabinet and agency level convictions, harsh sentences, might deter future potential functionaries from cooperating with a future would be dictator

  2. Arresting the Republican justices on the supreme Court and holding them in guatanemo and appointing a new court. Expanding the supreme Court would just be undone by the next Republican president with a trifecta. #1 might make that less likely, but with our current court so thoroughly corrupting our government from the inside 1 and 2 are unlikely to do anything useful.

[–] ChristerMLB@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

maybe you're right, but Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris were both the wrong candidates for the wrong time, and ran not very good campaigns - I'd rather conclude that this is not the time for an uncharismatic status quo candidate, than that this is not the time for a woman candidate

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Agreed. I will not compromise in a primary. I will vote for the best candidate to run and if America wants to goose step off a cliff then you will find me in the camps.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 93 points 3 days ago (19 children)

The only poll that matters is the one in November. Let's hope people show up this time.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 67 points 3 days ago (12 children)

While I agree with the underlying sentiment, this is actually false.

The primaries NOW for upcoming Senate and Congress seats are just as, if not more important than the inevitable outcome in November.

If you need any proof, just look at the outsized coverage every single DSA-linked candidate has gotten since winning their respective primaries.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 12 points 2 days ago

The primaries are the battle that matters. The Democratic establishment is the enemy.

Absolutely. I will vote in the primaries, for the furthest left candidate that runs.

I will do the same in November. It's the ONLY way we move the goalposts to the left. Not voting is not an option

Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. We're not going to get perfect. Human beings are deeply flawed creatures. I'll settle for less evil.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

vote, people…don’t be we the sheeple

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dudesss@piefed.ca 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If you don't vote, your opinion about politics doesn't matter

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

If you don't vote, you're voting for the winner.

That's why 2/3rds of Americans voted for Trump.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you choose not to vote rather. I know plenty of people who can't, mostly because they are young. The others haven't gotten all of their rights restored after a felony conviction or are noncitizens. But if I use your rule, I get to ignore all of the rest of the world regarding politics because they didn't vote in my local elections

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ofc only the ones that are able to. What even is this comment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Radical_Socialist_t00t@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It was never about showing up. Elon obviously bought last election.

While I think it's probably true, I haven't seen any evidence of it. Anomalies aren't facts unfortunately

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 20 points 2 days ago (7 children)

He's so unpopular nothing he tries to do will matter. He's going to get a dem congress and senate and we're going to impeach his ass.

[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

HE WAS ALREADY IMPEACHED THE FIRST TIME, and it didn't do shit. Does no one else remember that?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Just because it lost in the Senate twice doesn't mean you should make losing a part of your identity

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

I'm sure the third time will be different

[–] Thor_Whale@lemmus.org 4 points 1 day ago

I doubt it. They're bought off already. We'll get stagnation that's all. Nothing to help citizens thrive.

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 days ago

Dem congress yes. Doing their job? No. Even when they’ve had a supermajority in the last 30 years they still hid behind Republicans to not pass legislation. Need new parties.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh God, why are all y'all still going on about impeachment? Shit like that no longer works.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

There are literally no downsides to doing it.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 2 days ago

I don't think there'll be enough to force it through.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Dems will not win the Senate, get real.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This was the plan since day 1. Don’t act surprised now or when there are armed guards at polling stations. Stay safe and informed everyone.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

When you see armed guards at the polls, call them Nazi Pigs as you pass by.

load more comments (3 replies)

Stay hungry, get mad and take back your fucking country! 🔫 💣 🔥 ☠️

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

…and it won’t cost him a single vote.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 8 points 3 days ago

“Trump plainly says dumb scheme”

FTFY

load more comments
view more: next ›