To me, this is the right approach. Contributors should not be submitting code that they don't understand and can't adjust.
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
110 points (100.0% liked)
Godot
7745 readers
51 users here now
Welcome to the programming.dev Godot community!
This is a place where you can discuss about anything relating to the Godot game engine. Feel free to ask questions, post tutorials, show off your godot game, etc.
Make sure to follow the Godot CoC while chatting
We have a matrix room that can be used for chatting with other members of the community here
Links
Other Communities
- !inat@programming.dev
- !play_my_game@programming.dev
- !destroy_my_game@programming.dev
- !voxel_dev@programming.dev
- !roguelikedev@programming.dev
- !game_design@programming.dev
- !gamedev@programming.dev
Rules
- Posts need to be in english
- Posts with explicit content must be tagged with nsfw
- We do not condone harassment inside the community as well as trolling or equivalent behaviour
- Do not post illegal materials or post things encouraging actions such as pirating games
We have a four strike system in this community where you get warned the first time you break a rule, then given a week ban, then given a year ban, then a permanent ban. Certain actions may bypass this and go straight to permanent ban if severe enough and done with malicious intent
Wormhole
Credits
- The icon is a modified version of the official godot engine logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)
- The banner is from Godot Design
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I agree. When I read their post, I thought good for them. It seems fair and they did a good job explaining the reasoning.
Oh hell yeah! One company with some damned sense
Policy seems like a fair and good compromise.
Awesome policy
Transparent rules build stronger CDMWorlds.
I don't understand what concrete steps are being taken. People can still submit stuff and let all communication go through an LLM. What is concretely being changed here in the flow of things?
If they see it they can reject the PR instead of going back and forth with a robot now without any complaints because they can just point to "follow our guidelines"
Without the ability to say "It goes against the guidelines" the annoying robot can tirelessly complain and plead to let its robot code into the codebase. It can keep saying "there are no rules against robot slop contributions" or "there are no rules against using a robot as a medium for conversation" draining more time and energy from a finite pool of people capable of spending time and energy reviewing code and communicating.