this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
-4 points (25.0% liked)

UK Politics

5561 readers
193 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The fuck is this russian propaganda piece?

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

After reading the article... I agree with you. The framing of this article is definitely suspect.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Novara Media. Tells you all you need to know.

[–] okwithmydecay@leminal.space 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is that supposed to mean? Most of the time, people vote up Novara Media articles. However, I acknowledge this is an exception to that.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Novara Media was (is) basically the mouthpiece for Jeremy Corbyn back in the day. They've never liked anything short of a Corbyn premiership and their articles have been soaked in this heavy handed not so subtle bias for pushing a decade.

So I'm not surprised that they're shitting on Starmer whom they literally view as Judas.

[–] okwithmydecay@leminal.space 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is all true, and Ash Sarkar even calls herself a communist. However, I'd rather my news outlets wore their politics on their sleeve, than trying to hide behind supposed "impartiality". Are there even any neutral news outlets?

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

GB News also wears their politics on their cravats 🤣. And yeah fair enough NV are unabashedly what they believe in.

Are there any neutral news outlets? Probably not strictly. But some are at least trying harder than others.

[–] Chronal@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

I like how the article spends four paragraphs on Starmer before rambling on about how Ukraine joining NATO is a bad thing. 🤔

[–] Trebuchet@europe.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because who else could suck up to Trump as well as Rutte

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For all his shortcomings, Starmer actually pushed back against Trump, to the point of aligning the UK with Europe rather than the US or some kind of equivocating position

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

I've heard this nonsense before but immediately after being absolutely non-committal about whether he was aligning the UK behind the US or not, he allowed the US to use UK bases as staging points to attack Iran.