Let's imagine a person who has a vagina, a G-spot, and a prostate. If that person was laying on their back and you put a finger in their vagina palm up, you'd hit in the vacinity of the G-spot with the pad of your finger if you curled your finger like you were making a "come here" motion. To hit the prostate, you'd have to turn your hand palm down and roughly do the same thing.
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Bad Women's Anatomy
1110 readers
1 users here now
A subreddit for discussions about how certain people just don't understand how women's bodies work.
Rules:
- No brigading.
- Please be sure that you have the anatomy right.
- You don't have to be polite but you do have to conduct yourself like a responsible adult.
- Respect your fellow human.
- ~~Please select the appropriate flair for your post.~~ (Flair does not exist on lemmy... yet? hopefully?)
- ~~Please check the List of Common Reposts~~. (Doesn't exist on lemmy yet)
- Fetish art and low effort posts: see wiki
- No medical advice.
- ~~Photoshop Phriday: see wiki~~ (Suspended until migration is over)
- No trolling.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Thank you for the illustration.
It's important to keep in mind that while the idea of a vaginal area being more sensitive than others is generally supported in research, the details regarding it are a bit all over the place: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8498956/
It can vary greatly between women, and while the majority might self-report that a more sensitive area is in the anterior wall (towards the front of the body), a number report more sensitive areas in the wall near the back of the body instead.
Rather than trying to identify a "one size fits all" concept of the G-spot, it's arguably better to recognize that there's a high likelihood of certain areas being more sensitive to stimulation but consider the exact location and size of those areas to vary person to person.
As is generally the case, it's best to communicate with a partner and to experiment to find what's individually ideal rather than having an expectation of a 'norm.'
Good to know.