this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
581 points (99.2% liked)

Uplifting News

19685 readers
472 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aatube@lemmy.world 88 points 2 months ago

The linked article is an inferior but true copy of https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-eu-rules-stop-destruction-unsold-clothes-and-shoes-2026-02-09_en , an EU press release with the same headline and, as far as I can tell, true.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago

Fast Fashion has always been a problem and I hope this will combat that.

[–] tae_glas@slrpnk.net 57 points 2 months ago (1 children)

here's hoping governments will stop fast fashion at the source too!

clothing companies need to be forced to fairly pay their workers, have decent working hours & conditions for them, and planned obsolescence for clothing (via flimsy thin fabrics etc) needs to be regulated out of existence. 🤞

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Last September I needed a new pair of jeans. I was in a mall and saw the Levi's store. I remembered how long my Levi's would last in the past and figured I should put the extra money for a good pair that will last. Prices where nowhere to be seen, I tought mabe 60-80$ since I knew they where expensive. Got to the cashier and total was 130$ for a single pair of jeans!

Worst is I barely wore them and they are already full of holes! WTF !

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

this makes me so sad, levis are my go to. comfy and well made..or they used to :(

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

My Levi's split right down my leg after like 2 years of wearing them mostly just in the winter.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Earlier this year, doing a closet cleanup, I finally retired a pair of 501's that I bought in the Late 80's. They were falling apart at the pocket seams. They of course had a bunch of rips and abrasions, but they were just cool.

Last year I bought a pair of 505's. They are starting to fall apart. They are pre-faded, which means chemically or mechanically stressed. The 501's were old school shrink to fit, dark indigo. You faded them by wearing them and washing them 100's of times.

The new 505's are made of clearly much inferior denim.

They were also cheaper, an impulse buy for a teenager.

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

hopefully you weote to levi and complained? the sales/complaints ratio need levelling.

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

No I will simply never buy anything from them ever again.

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So they are going to be shipped abroad to get destroyed?

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It'll get more expensive so were just have to keep removing the incentive structures to destroy

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I had a talk about my mayor about investing on incineration as both an energy source and a trash management. So they'd throw those clothes to be burned onto electricity next day

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You mean like how every time there's a sports championship the losing team's merch ends up in Africa somewhere?

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

At least they get worn.

They just need to get the people that receive them hooked up with EBay to sell them to collectors. That would probably help economically…. Or something

[–] xia@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Nah, just pay a set of middlemen to handle them until they all mysteriously vanish.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We need to stop these manufacturers from offering a clothing line to every single pop culture phenom because of "business".

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Um, but then how line go up?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sweden tried to something similar last year, they banned throwing out old clothes with the garbage, you had to hand it in to specific collection points.

In just a few weeks the system was broken and overloaded, they didn't have the capacity to deal with the sudden influx of material.

[–] HumbleExaggeration@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Germany did something similar. Since then most collection points closed, because they ha to sort through to much unusable clothing that for thrown in there.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 months ago

i donate usable clothing and cut up the rest as cleaning rags or strips for rugmaking. reduse, reuse, THEN recycle.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Next step: ban non-degradable synthetic textiles.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What will they do then? Are they setting up sufficient recycling capability?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If only the author included some sort of way to learn more, like an article or something.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Don’t be silly. Articles aren’t to be read! Just discussions of headlines

[–] vane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They will export it.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This isn't that uplifting if you know just how much donations of used clothing harms developing countries and actually like the planet we all share.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That sounds like when Clinton was arguing that paying the workers in (Haiti?) better would ackshually hurt them because the businesses would flee to cheaper places...

Should we really maintain toxic systems because they have one positive benefit?
I would argue that sifting through piles of rubbish is not a positive benefit :/

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There's several African countries that have straight banned shipments of clothing to them. Those shipments destroyed the booming local textile industries they had, and that they are trying to rebuild. Textile industries are the key and first step to bootstrap industrialization, as understood in Europe (see the start of it in England, and how the automation helped and fed back on itself).

If you think globalization is not a yoke, I don't know what to tell you.. The global rich north needs a poor south to exploit or the system isn't profitable for them.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

That's interesting thank you for taking the time to explain.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

That screenshot gives me a vibe of “this is just like the mall, gems surrounded by trash.”

[–] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Isn’t this a general problem? What will be so special about clothing produced on July 16th?

[–] Mister_Feeny@fedia.io 24 points 2 months ago

That's just when the law goes into effect, it's not about when the clothes are produced.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"From" should be "starting". Probably whoever wrote it is not a native English speaker.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

from (prep.)

  1. [...]
  2. [...]
  3. Used to indicate a starting point or initial reference.
    1. Indicating a starting point in time.
      "Tickets are available from 17th July."