this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
1354 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40538 readers
4178 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 3 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

We need to bring back actual learning. Sorry, but an accredited source will always be better than anything emerging from nazi owned X.com.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 14 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

It's not elitism. It's fucking fact. Someone trained in a discipline knows more about said discipline than someone who isn't

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 minutes ago

Not to say that you're wrong, but this is a dangerous argument. There are a FUCKTON of antivax nurses and numerous antivax doctors.

Yogo moms are a universally bad source, but even 'credible' sources suffer the appeal to authority fallacy .

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

No, don't just blindly believe professionals either.

Cause some of them a assholes who try to sow discord for their own personal profit.

Like Andrew Wakefield, who started the whole "Vaccines cause autism!" fraud, because he wanted to sell shit that would benefit from the distrust he was creating and thought undermining faith in existing medicine would be a great marketing ploy.

and theres been tons of famous, formerly reputable doctors since, that have put down their ethics and picked up the snake oil since then. Like Mehmet Oz.

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

I have had pharmacists refuse to hand over the script after asking a few questions because it turned out the prescribing doctor was actually very incredibly dangerously wrong.

[–] PacketPilgrim@thelemmy.club 1 points 40 minutes ago

It's only going to get worst. I am already seeing those at work double check anything you say against an LLM and they come back with some version of well ChatGPT says... They don't realize how much of a sycophant LLMs can be and if you ask a question a certain way it will just agree with you and find some kind of BS data to back you up.

[–] huey_m@reddthat.com 5 points 1 hour ago

I've said it before, I'll say it again: this kind of "elitism" is literally just division of labor which is basically required for a modern society to function.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Look, I have no qualifications at all, but I did read a blog post. So I’m pretty sure I know what I’m talking about

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago

Well at least you've read something which puts you ahead of most anti-vaxxers, who just rely on Facebook videos.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I hate to disagree with you, but I'be honestly got a feeling and I can't think of a better reason than that.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Why don't we structure our political systems around the scientific method? That is all of the policies are testable and the goal is the optimization of the HDI, GDPPP, and environmental impact. Why employ policies based on beliefs or feelings when we can just test them.

[–] yelling_at_cloud@programming.dev 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Not just influencers, but also politicians and news media. I have a master's degree in statistics, and it's not at all uncommon for politicians and media to misrepresent scientific results. Correlation does not equal causation. If a study hasn't been peer reviewed, I wouldn't say that it proves anything just yet. Studies on a non-representative sample aren't generalizeable to the population as a whole. And so on..

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago

And science is more about disproving things anyway. It's more of a "this is the best we can tell right now, given the information and observations we currently have"

Not "zomg vaccines cause puppy deaths! My dog died after getting hit by a car but wouldn't have if he hadn't been vaccinated! See? I proved it!"

[–] Vreyan31@reddthat.com 32 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

As someone who is an expert in one area and as dependent as anyone else in others, and who also hates appeals to authority -

To me, the correct stance is that any should be able to question things that don't make intuitive sense or that one suspects might be a perspective motivated by financial considerations instead of expertise.

Note that I said question. Not invent your own replacement fever-dream explanation.

Questions require good-faith attempts to find information and understand.

Not pitch something where its main virtue is that it makes ignorance feel good actually.

[–] huey_m@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I generally agree, but there is a level of ignorance where you don't even really know what questions to ask, and subjects complicated enough that you just aren't equipped to understand an answer without needing a lot of background education first because they just aren't intuitive at all by nature. At that point, is there really much value in asking the question?

Determining where that line is is hard sometimes, but I do think it's there.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago

Asking questions doesn't hurt. If the answer still confuses someone, they then need the humility to admit it instead of covering their ears and yelling "I CAN'T HEAR YOU"

[–] rayhem@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

This breaks down pretty quickly though because laypeople fundamentally don't engage with the world scientifically. The default mode is "can I believe this" but science requires "have I excluded everything else". The former feels like the job is done, so why put in more work?

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

There's a reason peer reviewed studies are so important.

It's literally other people with knowledge on the subject questioning the results of a study until everyone agrees to the conclusion.

It's not just one person pulling something out of their ass and saying "Look! This thing!" and everyone just going along with it. It's questioned and proven multiple times.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I just want people to trust. Being skeptical and wanting to learn is perfectly fine, but also, people do go to school for these things for years, you know? Have a little a faith they aren't lying to you.

By "you" I just mean people generally, of course.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 8 hours ago

You're both spot on. We live in a deliberately low trust society with grief merchants heckling experts for the sole intention of division.

I don't know how we can get back to a high trust society, but it did exist once, and I think the first step to it is education and the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine in the media

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I dont mind if people stream but sometimes the exaggerated thumbnails with their stupid exaggerated expressions is so fucking weird. Like it smells like LOOK AT ME.

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 hours ago

Use the "dearrow" browser expansion. It's a game changer

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Good luck making the pigs stop eating slop

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Capitalism has been grooming its people to be the piggiest pigs for decades.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

We need to start tellingmtjmem to close their mouths because we dont want to smell the shot in them whenever the pigs start talking.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

they basically started the whole pseudoscience movements, a couple of fake diseases: morgellans, Chronic lyme was all coined by midwestern moms having psychosomatic, delusional parasitosis events. i went to other forums, and the symptoms they described are not of infectious diseases, by some mental illness they describing.

Maybe we shouldn't perpetuate dunning-krugerization such that everyone feels they fully understand the effects of a magnetosphere on orbital mechanics after a one paragraph explanation. The sense of 'ownership' and 'mastery' people seem to have of a field after ~~ingesting~~ licking like two facts is really disappointing.

[–] uberfreeza@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Based on what I see in this thread, I find more of an issue to be media. Mainstream media can walk the line of truth and falsehood and make people think a certain way. Anyone who sees that can be redirected to an online source, which can be anybody from Jane/John Infantbrain to legitimate scientists. Being an influencer doesn't preclude being a specialist, academic, etc., but the average person isn't going to determine or care for the difference.

load more comments
view more: next ›