this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
391 points (98.5% liked)

Funny

15427 readers
791 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Game. Map for the game. Background video/music/audio book. btop. Fastfetch x 8

[–] WagnasT@piefed.world 93 points 4 days ago (11 children)

I was idly wiggling my mouse while wating for a download and the cursor got HUGE. I didn't know KDE even had such a feature.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 68 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I have the banana cursor and I amuse myself daily by making my banana big banana

It's just so damn amusing

Link for the magnificent banana cursor: https://store.kde.org/p/1931412/

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Nobody thinks of the banana for scale? How do we do now?

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Someone should make a penis cursor. That would be double amusing.

I doubt it doesn't exist already

[–] mountaincalledmonkey@sopuli.xyz 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I love this feature in kde, if only just to amuse

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 7 points 4 days ago

My use case (other than amusement) is to point out something on the screen to my girlfriend who is on the other side of the room. Wiggle the mouse for a bit until it's big and then circle the thing needing focus lol

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago

This has been a thing in MacOS for years, and it always felt so simple and... obvious? Well, it seems, finally someone else has implemented it

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah i disabled it cuz I always wiggle and it was distracting me too much lmao

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

It also got huge while hovering over Kwrite. Only once and that was a bug.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe 37 points 3 days ago (4 children)

KDE has this feature that if you keep wiggling the cursor fast enough it gets as big as the screen, which would be useful in this situation

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

that's a neat way, as it is very intuitive. one always wiggles the mouse to search for the cursor :) at some point i had a shortcut for that, but would always forget about its existence

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can double-click Ctrl on Windows 11

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Lost your cursor? That's okay, just use your mouse to double-click the Ctrl key on your keyboard and you'll find it!"

(Not what you meant of course but accidentally sounded too much like an AI slop answer, fitting for Windows 11)

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lmao. What verb do you use when pressing a key twice then? "Double-press" sounds weird, doesn't it?

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Double-caress, clearly??

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Double tap.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So that's why my cursor randomly gets huge...

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Windows: install power tools then double tap ctrl.

Linux: search "locate pointer" a lot of desktop environments support this natively, or you can extend it power tools style. On GNOME ctrl should also highlight the cursor.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago

On KDE you just shake it

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 days ago

Hell, Windows has had the locate cursor option natively since like XP I think.

I've had to turn it off forever since I'm a bit spastic on the keyboard, haha

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Nah. I'm just going to ⬆️🔄🔃↪️↖️↘️↩️➡️↘️🖱️↙️⤴️⬇️↩️⬆️⬇️⬅️↗️🔃🔄

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Accidently pressed prtscn and roasted their RAM.

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

Furiously pressing ctrl

[–] subOrange@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can anyone tell what kind of work he's actually using those for? The image is a little too potato for me to make much out.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

We have rooms like this where i work. Theyre for live monitoring jet engine tests so we can monitor 1000+ pieces of instrumention to make sure the engines running safe.

That said, that floor looks too nice to be in our kind of facility. But i imagine hes got to be monitoring something in live time. Each screen is probably dedicated to a sub-system so he knows if something turns yellow or red, he immediately knows what system it is, whats going on, and can call the test back to a "safe operation"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Many control rooms require you to keep an eye on a lot of things at the same time and have similar setups

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

What kind of hardware do you need to run 15 screens?

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Four GPU's with four outputs each would do it.

You'd only need a main board with for x16 physical slots as PCIe x4 would be sufficient bandwidth for desktops.

You're also not pushing the GPU's power envelope, so one beefy or two smaller PSU's would suffice. The AMD WX7000 series workstation cards don't even have the extra PCIe power connectors (last time I looked).

I suspect these are more likely to be two or more machines though.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 4 days ago

Matrox makes some crazy multi-monitor GPUs that could do this without needing as many cards.

Here's their 8-display version:

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

AMD GPUs used to be really good at this. Not sure how well it works nowadays, with generally higher resolutions and thus higher bandwidth requirements. I'd imagine it involves a lot of trial and error with displayport chaining.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Matrox cats are even better. 8 displays per card.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

TIL Matrox still exists. I think I used to have one of their cards in the 90s, but I don't remember which.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A modern computer can easily fit 4 low-end GPUs plus the onboard one. Most things that used the slots are onboard the motherboard or USB now.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's not what it looks like in my PC, but I guess you might be right. Although it seems that most motherboards, people can actually afford come with far fewer full PCIe slots.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

If you can afford 15 huge monitors, you can splurge on the motherboard with extra PCI-E slots.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago

The main limitation here is number of monitor ports.

Applications that use this many screens aren't running a high level of graphics. Even a bunch of camera feeds aren't going to strain the GPU.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

The cursor problem seems like it wouldn't be there with a tiling wm.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Just eliminate a few of them monitors, then it's much easier.

load more comments
view more: next ›