this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
1140 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85571 readers
3722 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 237 points 1 week ago (3 children)

St Louis fighting for us again. We don't deserve this hero but we fucking need him

[–] warm@kbin.earth 63 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It's small claims court, so anyone else getting fucked by this wont benefit. It's going to take a bigger case. This will be forgotton about in a coupke months and Samsung will keep doing it.

[–] ID10T@programming.dev 37 points 1 week ago

Most business laws are just pay-to-play regulation anyways

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not true. If you can cite another similar small claims case against the company, the Judge will take that under consideration as well.

It's only not beneficial if they settle outside court and have a non disclosure agreement. And that's not going to happen with Rossmann. There is zero doubt in my mind that he would turn down a million dollar payout to keep quiet.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I also don't expect him to settle. Louis has principles and a DGAF - get it done attitude and an extreme allergy to bullshit. Truly a hero for the people. All he asks is that we participate and speak out on these issues. My next guys poker night (or equivalent) might include a group email writing session. I know several people who I would not have expected to get involved who have written their reps regarding right to repair and other consumer advocacy and freedom issues.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

Yep. Samsung knows what's up. Settle a couple small claims here and there and fuck everyone else.

But if he has success, well, I can go to the lawyer and show him that success (because I'm in the same boat right now), maybe it just needs more cases...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Louis taking the financial hit for all of us. One of the few people that are "famous" I would buy a coffee if I were to see him on the street.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He seems mean spirited and just a bit unstable to me, but I think that’s just an encode/decode mismatch in communication styles. What’s important is he can speak the truth to power AND BE HEARD. And for that I will absolutly cheer that crazy bastard on.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

I believe a bit of that we're seeing is being self-titled as "dark woke" lol. I'd count myself among them. Where, instead of trying to hold decorum and be super duper respectful, if you see or hear someone doing something immoral, you call that shit out and you do it hard. Modern day "punch a Nazi" and not accrue assault charges essentially.

Not to turn it entirely political, but I see it as the next step based on how politics have evolved. Conservatives would often do and say terrible things themselves, but then they'd tell liberals/centrists "but where's the tolerant left, where's you're decorum, how could you do these terrible things" etc etc and it would work fairly well where establishment dems would shrink back in their holes or they'd "work across the aisle" and produce half measures that barely helped the public, if at all, rather than standing on principle.

Now, I think you're seeing a lot more, especially leftists, essentially say fuck that and push back and go on the offensive to knock them down a peg. And given that most conservative talking points are all bluster, they have no real principle or ideology, it falls flat with a more aggressive stance backed up by facts and principle.

Louis gives off that to me, as many leftists are grounded in principle to do what is right for people and humanity. He's saying, look, Samsung, you're a piece of shit and I know you're a piece of shit to others, and I know that you know others won't be able to push back against you, you're taking advantage of them. So fuck you, I'll stand up for both myself and all the others you've been harming. Let's fucking go.

People are tired. And we know what is right. And we're tired of being gaslit and taken advantage of.

An example of what I'm kind of talking about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZzZCo_JKO4

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

not to turn it entirely political, but

proceeds to use the next few paragraphs to turn it political

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Same way you use the phrase "no offense" right? Lol

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] malloc@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t say it’s a "financial hit". He has specifically worded his YT video to make it seem as if he will hire a lawyer and take Samsung et al to court. But in reality he is definitely planning on filing this in a local small claims court.

Still want to see him win because honestly he deserves it and fuck Samsung. But he does tend to be a bit over dramatic in his videos for the clicks/viewership 😂

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But in reality he is definitely planning on filing this in a local small claims court.

Which is arguably better, because it demonstrates to other people how they too can fight back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm rooting for him, but I also can't recall any warranty agreement that didn't include something along the lines of "or refund of original purchase price at manufacturers discretion" as an acceptable remedy instead of replacement.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 117 points 1 week ago (4 children)

At the bottom of the article it cites that they have the right to refund if they can’t repair or replace, but since they’ve shown plenty of stock in their own store they can replace. He also cites their own policy which reads “refund the then current market value of the Product”.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Agreeing with you here, they probably had the last line there to save themselves money, as historically tech items lose value over time, so if you bought an ssd for $200, and 6 months later needed to be replaced or refunded, historically they can realistically offer you $150, as that would traditionally be the new market value after 6 months, but in today's timeline, now its apparently worth $900 and they probably don't want to pay that.

Samsung hurt itself in confusion

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah I think it's a tall order, but I also don't have the impression that rossmann picks a fight without having a pretty good chance of winning.

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Small claims court is likely where this is filed. So, it’s very likely he will get the desired outcome.

edit: ended up watching video on yt at 2X. It is indeed his plan to file suit in small claims court, or as he puts it in his email, "Justice Court of Travis county, Texas" if his demands to replace at current market value or provide replacement are not met.

The video implies he is willing to spend time and money that exceeds the cost of drive to get the outcome desired. But I think that’s more of a performative statement since it’s going to small claims which has very reasonable case fees and can defend self.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

It also draws a bunch of negative attention to Samsung for this scummy move. Ideally more media pick this up.

That samsung doesn't have a replacement drive in stock is a blatant lie. They just want to sell him one for the inflated price.

They never used to give you full refunds when these drives lost value over time. And if they did it wasn't what you paid origionally. Now their price is ballooned and suddenly they are eager to do so.

It's extremely clear what Samsung is doing here.

Edit/Addendum that i take no credit for:

Evidently it's against their own warranty terms: https://semiconductor.samsung.com/consumer-storage/support/warranty/

In the event Samsung determines, in its sole discretion, that the Product suffers from defects in material or workmanship and does not substantially conform to the published specifications under normal use, for as long as You own the Product and during the limited warranty period, and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in this Agreement, Samsung will, at its option, either: (1) repair or replace the Product with new or refurbished Product of equal or greater capacity and functionality; or (2) refund the then current market value of the Product at the time the warranty claim is made to Samsung if Samsung is unable to repair or replace the Product.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Also in that policy, however:

IN NO EVENT WILL SAMSUNG’S LIABILITY EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY YOU FOR THE PRODUCT.

Shitty? Absolutely. Legally sound? Honestly, I don't think there's a chance in hell Samsung loses this... but is it worth the negative PR?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tb_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But I think that’s more of a performative statement

Should it somehow go beyond that, somehow, I have little doubt Louis will put his money where his mouth is. He's paid $10.000 bounties to people demonstrating they can crack locked firmware, and done lots of other things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This and the battery thing are some good content.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Oh the battery thing is delicious drama. Just chef’s kiss

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heatermcteets@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Just had a similar thing happen to me. Bought some WD reds. Two drives were DOA. Since no drives were available to replace them, I could return for a refund. Then had to buy drives when they were in stock again at double the price.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (17 children)

It’s like DoorDash giving you a partial refund and not actually getting you what you ordered when there is a fuckup by the restaurant.

How satisfied are you with your customer support? I didn’t get what I fucking ordered!

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think doa refund is kind of fair. Should compensate you a little for wasting your time but you're made whole. RMA though feels like they should replace.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 39 points 1 week ago (15 children)

The wording of Samsung's warranty seems to support this conclusion:

"{...}during the limited warranty period, and subject to the conditions and exceptions stated in this Agreement, Samsung will, at its option, either: (1) repair or replace the Product with new or refurbished Product of equal or greater capacity and functionality; or (2) refund the then current market value of the Product at the time the warranty claim is made to Samsung if Samsung is unable to repair or replace the Product." [emphasis added]

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's funny is this wording was likely designed to try and screw over the customer and backfired, because historically a used SSD has always been cheaper than the original purchase price. But in this specific market, it works in the consumer's favor.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which is, of course, why they suddenly feel entitled to not follow their own rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I admire this guy's stubbornness. Sadly, even if he ends up winning, Samsung probably won't feel this at all.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It sets some precedent for future lawsuits so it might keep Samsung in line for the next one.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

“ Please allow ads on this site. Click OK to learn more.”

No, no I don’t think I will.

https://archive.is/ioHq5

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck the chaebol

load more comments
view more: next ›