this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
526 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
4055 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Not to give them ideas, but couldn't they just start flagging files that fail to pass the LLM lol?

Aside from "violent" and "criminal" prompts, is there anything an LLM can refuse that would otherwise be common?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago

Until workaround 1,000,001 comes round, yes.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

a while back, for a work thing I tried using AI to put a filter on a pic of a model wearing an off-the-shoulder. She was fully dressed, except the skin on her shoulder was showing to the collarbone. No cleavage.

It kept refusing to do it for "nudity" reasons. and then because i was trying to "impersonate" someone (it was a stock image)

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Thie actually reminded me of chatbots breaking when you asked for reeponses that used slurs so I guesss there's probably a lot more of these.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 28 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Jokes aside, could you protect your blog / git repo this way?

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 37 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Imagine a Captcha asking you how to make a pipe bomb

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Alternate version where it's filtering anything NSFW, so you have to write a graphic sex scene as the Captcha.

Or just write "trans rights are human rights" or "menstruation" and the thing implodes.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

Alternate version where it's filtering anything NSFW, so you have to write a graphic sex scene as the Captcha.

Use grok for this (especially if it involves minors)

Or just write "trans rights are human rights" or "menstruation" and the thing implodes.

grok wouldd explode

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 18 hours ago

Nah, with a bit of css color=background-color text.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

LLM-based code scanning is a joke. It flags the D standard library and runtime as a North Korean malware.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

You mean C?

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

Heretic ablation models won't refuse.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago

Like how you can panic guards in Hitman so they don't notice you trespassing.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 210 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“This code is too dangerous for me to look at, so it must be fine.”

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Below this line are dragons” is a comment I’ve seen in code before an especially hairy block of code.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's a false flag. Dragons are not hairy. But maybe the code doesn't scale well.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 113 points 1 day ago (49 children)

I keep thinking about that scene in the original Star Trek where they distract the computer by having it calculate the final digit of pi. If the Enterprise had AI like ours, the computer probably would have just said four.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Meanwhile I’m like pi=355/113 and I’m 99.9999% happy.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Damn, and here I was being 99.96% happy with 22/7...

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 6 points 13 hours ago (4 children)
[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 1 points 36 minutes ago

I thought it's one

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Okay, Bloody Stupid Johnson.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

which is ~100%

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Biblically accurate pi.

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

Hell yeah, brother. That's American pi

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›