this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
166 points (88.4% liked)

Vegan

1854 readers
93 users here now

A place for solarpunks working toward a world without speciesism


Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

I gotta say, extrapolating from this thread, this is the worst "vegan" community I've seen since /r/vegan.

[–] mgrecca2026@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

deposing the tech bros is the no 1 way to help our planet

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (5 children)

No, the 'number one' way to help the planet is to not have children, undeniable fact. Diet is number two

[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago

That's a lot of absolutism for someone not specifying a defining context.

No definition of "help", "the planet" or "diet" means it's wide open to contra-examples.

[–] bequirtle@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like not having kids kinda defeats the purpose of saving the planet

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

That's your DNA's raging narcissism speaking. Not to impugn yours specifically, of course. The interests of an intelligent mind are not the same as the interests of the biological system that hosts it. Consider what's actually important to you as more than a pile of meat. Reproduction is so selfish when there are so many humans with unmet needs already reaching out for your help.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 8 points 17 hours ago

Actually, deposing the wealthy is #1, no children #2, and diet #3.

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago

I've not had 20 kids, so now I get to eat a bunch of animals, and fly a bunch of private jets, and roll coal all day long!

Also, your decision to eat meat in a western country DOES actually cause as much damage as some entire families existence in the poorer countries like Nigeria.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I think the assumption is that he's talking about people changing their diets. Can't / probably shouldn't advocate for parents getting rid of their children.

That said, there are probably more direct actions one can take for our ecology that eclipse consumer choices.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure excising the tumor that is the wealthy, the cause of most of our problems, comes first.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 16 hours ago

Anything to keep torturing animals

[–] mgrecca2026@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

As Yanis Varoufakis mentioned, the technofeudalists(the wealthy who own Big Tech) are the new fascists

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Cool, and you're actively doing that? You're working on a concrete plan that will actually create that outcome? And going vegan in the meantime will actually materially harm your efforts for that?

How often do we gotta pull out that tweet until you people learn? To paraphrase: "People online will be like 'Your approach of veganism pales in comparison to my plan of eating the rich!', and then never eat the rich or go vegan.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, so he is exactly right! Switching to a diet of very rich red meat

[–] benderbeerman@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (21 children)

As related by famed biologist and renowned chemist Woody Harrelson PhD, millionaire esq.

NEVER Trust the rich when they tell you that your decisions are causing the problems.

The real problem is that the rich only give the poor so many options to choose from. Then they tell the poor to blame other poors for choosing wrong.

NEVER TRUST CELEBRITIES OR THEIR PROPAGANDA

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 4 points 17 hours ago

Well, the beauty of research is that you can actually do it, instead of spouting whatever nonsense that was.

If Bill Gates tells you tomorrow to not kill puppies, you killing puppies overmorrow?

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›