this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
120 points (99.2% liked)

Privacy

5755 readers
509 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

they're fucking weaponizing TMPS sensors now??

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Called it! Totally called this!

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

Sadly not a surprise, this is why I switched back to wired headphones some time ago and like how Graphene turns Bluetooth off automatically if not in use.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Always remember. If they can, they will. We are powerless animals to people with power.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

that's only useful if they are in pursuit tho, because the device beeing in the car (or near the sensor) is not proof of the owner being actually there, especially if it's devices that don't even have lock functions, like airpods.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 6 points 12 hours ago

as if cops give a shit about such a fundamental aspect of what their jobs are purported to be

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's enough, especially if you collect several data points over time

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

for what? for in court? i doubt it

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

leaving the house with a dumbphone on a faraday bag and that's it

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Some even check the wireless TPMS tire sensors…

Drive a car made later than 2007? Too bad they're profiling the car electronics already.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm routing my cellphone through VoIP in my house to a landline phone... I will be not using a cellphone in the near future. all calls to the house, if I'm not home... too bad, leave a message.

oh you need me to have a phone for mfa? too bad... I won't use your service or I'm going into the building. it's 1998 lifestyle for me now.

[–] Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're really doing this, that's amazing, call the media, a documentary needs to be made about you.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

oh you need me to have a phone for mfa?

For a master’s in fine art. Or for the metropolitan fransit authority.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

On the off chance someone stubbles upon this that is actually confused: "Multi-Factor Authentication"

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

I actually realized this seconds before your notification came through- I was thinking mono factor authentication as another joke option for a second and then it clicked.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's less creative than you could have been.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

My goal was not creativity. If it were i would have said My Fat Ass or somrthing equally silly

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Just getting content out fast? I'm not sure I approve. There's a lot to be said for timelessness.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So youre just built annoying?

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

See! Yes, it looks like lazy ad hominem on the surface, but use of the word 'built' gives it crispy flaky layers like an insulting croissant! Glad you came around!

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

A surveillance company plans to add sensors to automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) that would mean the devices, as well as capture the license plate of passing vehicles, would also sweep up unique identifiers of mobile phones, wearables, and other Bluetooth-enabled devices in those cars, potentially letting law enforcement identify specific drivers or passengers.

This sucks and shouldn’t be happening, but is also relatively simple to counteract if you turn your Bluetooth off. Of course most people won’t, which is why it sucks and shouldn’t be happening.

[–] yellerbadger@piefed.social 3 points 17 hours ago

I wonder if it gets to be like browser fingerprinting where turning your Bluetooth off itself becomes a data point in combination with your make, model, dents and dings on your car, etc.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

It'll probably suck and use AI to guess at mac addresses and just end up costing a bunch.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago

Also, most Bluetooth devices today - the ones they seem to be tracking, anyway - are using Resolvable Private Addresses, meaning the devices exchange not the MAC address directly, but a crypto key that can be used, in correlation with the current time, to determine a pseudo-randomly generated address and establish connection...

I've implemented Bluetooth tracking in my home (using ESPHome and in-house triangulation - I have appropriate nodes all over my home for this), and needed to extract the IRK for my iPhone and Apple Watch (but same goes for Android devices).

They may be able to track older Bluetooth devices (headphones and such), and older built-in Bluetooth systems in cars (not sure if they can be disabled tbf), but modern phones? Not unless they illegally tap into the phone somehow and extract the key for predicting the addresses.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago