this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
259 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30031 readers
2315 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frtzngbllr@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The fuck is happening in the us? It is getting worse and worse.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We are just returning to normal. The last 40 or so odd years were an anomaly in our 250 year span.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Should we start sending food and medical aid to you across the ocean?

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Can you send bombs instead to a specific location? The aid can go to other places

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Go on, Ted.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 4 points 5 days ago

Fair request, might be more cost effective as well. First ones towards a particular house of very light color perhaps?

There was a bridge that needed to be rebuilt and the locality actually lobbied I think Russia to pay for it since the federal government wouldn't. It was funded shortly after that.

Countries should absolute send aid if I only to embarrass us.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

I'd say it's the consequence of a lack of consequences.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Frankly, it's getting better, by getting worse. They are losing in court on literally everything. He lost so much this week, that they literally gave him a consolation win: they codified the name change to "The Department of War." That was his big win this week.

There is strong feeling that the momentum is now with the Democrats, and they are slowly, but inexorably grinding way at MAGA. Approval rates are steadily declining, and are close to dropping below the 30 percent mark. MAGA politicians are starting to push back against Trump, some even losing their protected status. He will really bleed support after the bloodbath Midterms, as the survivors look forward to 2028. A LOT of them are not going to want to be remembered as MAGA traitors when the Dems fully take over in 2028, so they will be whistling a different tune after the Midterms.

There is a definite feeling of a political shift in the country, and it's not just on the left. MAGA is in deep trouble, and they know it. They are fighting for their literal lives now, and they're going to get rough. But the rest of us know it, and we're ready. We aren't afraid of them, and we're looking forward to punishing them for their CRIMES.

There will be a big change in America after the Midterms.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

We aren't afraid of them, and we're looking forward to punishing them for their CRIMES.

I'd like to suggest any punishment involves a cauldron of boiling oil.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The four Democrats who voted with most Republicans to approve the measure were Reps. Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Adam Gray (Calif.), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.), and Don Davis (NC).

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And also 209 GOP, let's not forget about that.

Vicente already won the primary for his seat, however the other three are up for reelection NEXT YEAR so we should be focused on replacing them as soon as the midterms end. Anybody capable of challenging them should already be applying.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 5 days ago

Somebody is going to say that they are in competitive seats, so they had to vote with MAGA, but that's for when you're going to win the vote anyway, so you let a few vote against it to save face - but you don't lose the vote.

These are just four traitors who are too stupid to read their memos. The DNC is no longer in charge, we are. The Dems are where the Tea Party was in 2010 - we're taking over the party, and we don't care what the establishment Corporate Dems want. They are nearly as responsible for this mess as MAGA, and the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries is big part of the problem.

I'm hearing calls for Schmuck's removal as Senate leader,but Jeffries has got his people praising his piss poor leadership. They're saying that he's been able to balance the growing progressive movement, but that's about to explode in the House after the Midterms. The Progressive wing will not only be larger than ever, they will be highly MOTIVATED to collect MAGA scalps, and Jeffries better cooperate, or he'll be gone, too.

I'm not even for giving him a shot. He had his shot during the Biden administration, and he was more than willing to follow the Biden Administrations slow walk on punishing Trump. Just replace him with someone who is willing to fight for us.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

4 out of 212, I want to be real clear that we need to remove every single one of the GOP at all costs come November.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

With people who don’t take AIPAC money

[–] gwulgg@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago

Reps. Vicente Gonzalez (Texas) Adam Gray (Calif.), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.), and Don Davis (NC).

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 days ago

hope yall making alist of all this shit. one slash or whip lash for each kid and women who went hungry. you sobs

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Having useless eaters consume fruits and vegetables is very elitist, and is just (repeat it with me, kids!) waste, fraud, and abuse. Also, it's DEI and woke.

-- Kevin Hassett, probably (or Russell Vought. Or Stephen Miller. Or Steve Bannon. or any of a slew of right wing shitheads trying to ruin this country)

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

But both parties are the same!

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wish the US would collapse already..

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Right, that way they lose their social security, medicaid, and snap as well?

[–] SparkyBauer44@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, to hell with those 299,995,000 people. Small price to pay to get rid of the relatively minute government clan.

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Small price to pay to rid the world of a virus

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 5 days ago

Except it isn't proven to do that at all.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub -1 points 5 days ago

Collapse would be a lot of short term pain and chaos but that's where this train goes anyway. Sooner the better. Rebuilding might be possible