this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
72 points (90.9% liked)

United Kingdom

6801 readers
142 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gentryfried@feddit.uk 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They didn't rape any teenagers. This is just how royalty worka, obviously their uncle the king will still look out for them.

One of you say they're spongers because they're married; the royal family has multiple properties and plots of land, so it's basically like providing your nieces with one of your spare homes for when they're visiting the country (one of them is married to an italian man i think?).

It's Logical.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 30 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They didn't do anything wrong tbf. If a man wants to give accommodation to his nieces, let him.

[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They're literal royalty living off proceeds stolen from the citizens

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

That's true of all royals, not just daughters of pedophiles.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -2 points 1 month ago
[–] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's tax money. It could be used for better causes.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it tax money, or money he was paid then he is paying out?

I mean its a technical difference and I am not really defending anything, I just don't know how it works really.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The King owns land called the crown estate. He surrenders the profit to the treasury who then pays him back a small fraction of, which he also pays tax on.

The King does not get funded by tax money, just a small portion of what his family's land makes.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The King owns land called the crown estate.

Well he shouldn't.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Such a proposition is unrealistic. It's his family's land, he's the heir. At least he surrenders it to the government, unlike most land-owners.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's his family's land, he's the heir.

His family has avoided inheritance tax for centuries. It's totally realistic. Look at all the Republican countries.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the republican countries with great heads of states like Russia, Turkiye, The USA, etc

Those heads of state don't have Intergenerational wealth built over centuries. Monarchy is corruption on a totally different scale.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You mean only entitlement can pass by bloodline and not consequences of crime? Yeah, totally makes sense.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didn't do anything to earn it either...why the hell should a pedophile be allowed to steal money from everyone else to keep his family living in luxury forever?

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is no evidence to suggest that Charles III is a paedophile. If you need to lie and slander to support your argument, you don't have one to begin with.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're Andrews daughters, no one mentioned Charles. But also fuck that whole family, they all should have been executed a long time ago.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bro chill the fuck out, because the King had the balls to kick him out! What USA did for it's pedophiles? Did they kicked anyone out? Did they arrest them?
We should have executed Trump and it's friends long time ago then.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Not because he was a pedophile, because the family has been stealing and pillaging from the rest of humanity for generations. And yeah, trump and all the other billionaires can join them as far as I'm concerned.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because they're... still... royals? What am I missing

[–] IanM42@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Probably because most people thought they’d suffered the same fate as him, and were reduced to being mere mortals.

But yes they are still royals. And another reason to consign the royal family to history.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meh. I'm fine with having a royal family - sure there's a bunch of spongers but the fundamental principle of having a bunch of pomp and pageantry for the sake of tradition and jolly flag waving (as opposed to "get rid of the immigrants" flag waving) is fun and worth the price of entry. The price of entry pays rent for a bunch of people who did nothing to deserve it, because that's kind of how it works.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How many cousins deep do you want to go?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah, so are most of the royal family

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago

Nothing to see here... move along, please, move along... LOOK AT THOSE WORKSHY DISABLED ON PIP BENEFITS OVER THERE!

[–] IanM42@piefed.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Make them pay their rent or get out. Besides I thought they were married?

Spongers, the lot of them.

[–] ladel@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

I think the King is paying for them with his personal money, but it is weird.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The family pulls in a LOT of rent-money. I bet they don't need to pay much rent themselves on family land.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is a formula to make out the level of rents staff have to pay to either the Crown Estate or the royal Household because they have to live on the estate. 

It works out as equivalent to 16.7% of their gross pensionable salary.

What the fuck??? That’s for staff, not working royals, so the guy who used to iron Andrew’s shoelaces had to pay 1/6 of his pre-tax salaries in rent to live somewhere he didn’t choose.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbf they did choose. They dont have to work there and are free to leave. A lot of people pay 1/3rd of their income in rent, so 1/6th is honestly a pretty good deal IMO

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, yeah, they chose the job, but I’m assuming they can be reassigned and have to move if their boss moves. I’m sure there’s a long list of applicants, even knowing that, but it’s still kind of fucked up, especially considering that their boss definitely has enough money to pay for each of their employees’ rent, but they don’t. I guess I expected the work conditions to be better (like, some of the best in the commonwealth), but I don’t know why.

[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Who's the vampire in the middle of the picture? She freaks me out

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Andrew’s wife.

She loved how Epstein would fly her around in first class.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Had an alleged affair with P Diddy.

[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 1 points 1 month ago

Wow, that freak would baby oil anything, eh?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I was gonna say she looks like something that was summoned out of the Lemegeton...