this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

news

991 readers
615 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 24 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

can the rest of us sue for them not being negligent enough?

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, I mean we've suffered more damages

[–] valar@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

can we sue the crappy shooter?

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

I like how you think.

[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

They shot the bird from Duolingo?

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

These "failure to protect" lawsuits against cops get knocked down by SCOTUS don't they? As far as I know there's no duty to protect or serve based on legal precedent.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah, police only have a duty to protect you if you are in their specific care. For example: they cannot let a random person assault you while you are arrested.