this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
171 points (97.2% liked)

Privacy

4639 readers
207 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What if you woke up tomorrow and completely lost access to your bank account, credit cards, PayPal, and Venmo, all because of something you posted online?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Class action lawsuit. Their terms and conditions when I opened my accounts did not mention this and further, updating those terms and conditions and then closing my accounts is not justifiable. Since I'm likely not the only one they will do this to, it sounds to me like they need to learn a lesson.

My online campaign to point out every time one of their executives has said anything sus would be legendary.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

If things were shut down to prevent access to anything, I don't think legal action is possible, or even the path to take. Probably why it would never be done that quickly or drastically. The art of oppression is knowing the limit of what people will put up with and not crossing the line, but moving the line slowly. Go too fast, the commons get upset and find their torches.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Visa is already censoring the world's porn. As if we needed more reason to hate them.

[–] TotalCourage007@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

not just porn they are inserting themselves into every entertainment industry. all based on being control freaks. If you look at who visa vocally supports its a crazy rabbit hole.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For the USA and the rest of the world, Brazil has its own payment system as far as I know, and Europe is making one already, so jokes on you. Correct me if I'm wrong.

You're Rose. It says so right before the @

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 3 points 1 week ago

We have several, but are mostly country level. We are working on interconnecting them so payments and money can flow along the EU without any USA dependency.

And there is also the digital Euro for small payments, that is being also being developed right now.

International bank transfers and direct debit are already in place via the SEPA instruments.

[–] remon@ani.social 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pretty sure having a bank account is like an EU right, so banks can't just close your account willy-nilly over some online post.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, but VISA would hold the keys to the infrastructure that let's you use it in in a modern world.

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago

Except for maybe international online payments, there are already alternatives, so I don't quite see how.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (17 children)

WERO might be the EU alternative.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Visa doesn't hold the keys to the WERO infrastructure. WERO is basically a facilitator to the system of real time bank transfers that already exists anyway on European infrastructure. It is not a credit card system in that sense, because the money goes immediately from one account to another, but so what?

[–] IceFoxX@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not the banks, but the countries. The EU is getting the EU Wallet, and it must be linked to at least one bank account. This will allow other EU countries to enforce penalties and freeze accounts, seize funds, or whatever. Cool, right? 🤮

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Imagine a country like Hungary decides to freeze another's entire population bank account

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The EU wallet is not about financial transactions, is it?

Also there are two systems in the making, one is the public Digital Euro, the other is the private Wero. Sure, accounts could be frozen but neither a single company nor the US could freeze out people out of their financial life.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Most likely it is an EU right, but violations would require a lot of effort to straighten, so I wouldn't be surrised if they do sometimes close accounts willy-nilly

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Without having watched the video, but having an idea of what it's about given seeing a few places and creators I follow being sanctioned because the payment processors getting butthurt, I think it's worth mentioning crypto and direct competitors to the Visa and Mastercard mono(duo?)poly.

On crypto, if issue is that it burns too much energy, afaik generally new technologies are like that, improvements to consumption happening over time.

And about direct competitors, Russia made one from what I read, Brazil has Elo, and I think the EU was introducing their own recently. All 3 countries/country-like territories with their own problems, but I think it's a worth idea to copy and improve upon.

Also fomenting use of physical cash is a good idea too, me thinks.

[–] toebert@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fwiw, there are already some cryptos which use proof-of-stake instead of proof-of-work which overcomes the entire electricity consumption thing.

I do wish that places started accepting cryptos which were meant to be used for transactions (e.g. NANO) rather than ones like bitcoin that just happen to have existed for a while, but is technically inferior to most everything else.

Unfortunately, crypto in general challenges not just payment processors but the entire banking industry, and that's probably too much to ever succeed.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting!

About challenging the industry, I remember reading some years ago that Visa/MC enforced higher taxes on the companies that also accepted crypto. If that is/still is a thing, might give a hint of why it isn't more widely accepted.

[–] toebert@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's probably part of it! Banks are even more obvious about it. E.g. in the UK where crypto is a taxed and somewhat regulated thing, most of the banks have taken the stance of rejecting any payments to and from(!) exchanges, even if they're approved by the government. All because it's "high risk so they want to protect users". No such issue with gambling though, obviously.

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think you're confusing Elo (just a local company) with Pix, a government created interbank payment system. And from what I know of Pix, yes, we should all definitely copy that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IceFoxX@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s why we Germans love cash. By the way, all it takes is for the government to face a crisis... Just look at China and its real estate crisis. Many people don’t use cash anymore, and they ran into problems when they couldn’t make digital payments or withdraw money, etc.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lol wut.

Most banks in Germany charge you for taking cash out of your own account. It's one of the most difficult countries to use cash without getting fined for using cash

[–] IceFoxX@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've only ever seen that happen when using an ATM that belongs to a different bank

Edit: But Sparkasse would be a great negative example, because your point would hold true there—since not all Sparkasse branches are the same—and special laws were even drafted specifically because of Sparkasse, since they were actually charging fees as high as three-digit amounts back then. That was legally capped at a maximum of ~€10 (I’d have to look up the exact amount).

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Also ATMs have max withdrawals. And if you want to take a larger amount from a human at the window, there's a fee for that too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It has been happening for a long time now. Say something the government doesn't like and suddenly your bank and credit cards stop working.

This is done through a perverse private/public partnership where the US government will give a vague instruction to deplatform an individual or group and a private company will voluntarily enact this de facto ban.

The government then gets to claim they are not banning anyone and the private company can say they reserve the right not to do business with anyone.

Hell it used to be common to not even allow women or blacks access to banking.

https://kindredfutures.org/trapped-by-design-background/

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Asia has a very unique financial system in this sense. They are not reliant on 3rd party payment processors that can be counted on one hand, and they usually support P2P payment between banks. They also usually prefer to use QR than NFC (like on wechat, line, and kakao). This is one example standard that I found from Indonesia called QRIS, and they are expanding it wherever they can. Of course Visa is upset about those lol (see the section about US Government response)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QRIS

[–] razen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah UPI is great too in India.

[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why I liked the idea of Bitcoin in the beginning. (Before it became what it is now).

I still like Monero. It would make shit like this impossible to touch by authoritarian idiots.

[–] 01011@monero.town 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That point has been completely missed by all the speculators and the characters who hate the speculators, especially the institutional gamblers but think they hate btc.

[–] dismay3915@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Time for more monero

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The vocal fry made that video unwatchable, jfk. I think the video is about financial censorship. They have been warning about this for more than a decade now, but most recently Trump issued an executive order to force payment providers to keep customers despite religious or political beliefs (article by yahoo finance).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 5 points 1 week ago

It is about time for Wero and Digital Euro do get fully implemented across the EU. Until then, there are at least IBAN bank transfer that can secure a minimum viability of financial needs. That is at least for the EU, Brazil, India, China etc have alternatives in place already anyway.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

Good thing I deleted PayPal as soon as I heard of this. They can't do shit to me.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I know this is off topic but the cc companies are going crazy from a state law that passed saying how oh it will be so bad because they just won't be able to handle it at all and will have to pull out or something. eff em.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›