this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
873 points (99.4% liked)

memes

21420 readers
3338 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

And I'm male, though I was a woman for a few years there

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm glad they convinced me to turn my mattress purchase into a mattress collection.

[–] Unstoppable_Flop@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

This article about a person who bought an urn online is hilarious. Amazon thinks I'm a serial killer now (cracked dot com)

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

That article is a riot. Also disturbing and depressing. And confusing, but not because of the author, but because of Amazon.

I get that balancing out the different factors that play into the likelihood of buying it again is difficult, but with all the data they gather, it really shouldn't be impossible to figure out that the mode of "purchases per customer" for a given product cluster is 1 or that a frequent recommendation has not actually gotten any interest and use those for weighing the random recommendation selection.

Even within some product group you buy more frequently, there might be certain brands / vendors you prefer, so buying something once to try (particularly if it's new) and never again should also reduce the likelihood.

But I'm just a Junior Data Analyst, what do I know.

[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Where is this original meme from? Bleach?

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 1 points 12 hours ago

Yep. First episode iirc

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 108 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And yet I can explicitly type the exact parameters for an item I'm looking for into Google or Amazon and I get flooded with bullshit that is not that thing.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

“Oh you’re looking for a red KitchenAid blender type # 5KSB2073EER? Great! Here’s that 4 CD set of traditional Turkmenistan folk music you wanted.”

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry all these other companies paid us more to put their shit in front of your eyeballs than the one who sells the thing you want.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Amazon's primary revenue driver is selling the top spots in their search results. So it's no surprise that when you search for something, you almost never see what you're looking for. They have literally created a system that intentionally shows you what you're NOT looking for in order for them to make a profit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MirrorGiraffe@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Not until I finally buy something do I get floder with the right ads, at which point those ads are pointless.

For all the data they have on us they sure are pretty ass at utilizing it.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's because what you're searching for is what you definitely want, so they know you're likely click/buy it. But if throw a bunch of crap that you maybe might want before you get to it, maybe you'll buy some of that too. It's like how supermarkets throw a bunch of junk food in a checkout lane, maybe you'll get tempted while you're forced to stand there even though you just wanted to buy laundry detergent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

"Thinking about buying a machine that turns AI and Tech CEOs into fertilizer."

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Remember when people used to think we were crazy regarding advertising based on speech secretly recorded?

I do this fun thing I've dubbed the "platypus test" to show people how crazy it is. If you open Instagram and scroll through reels while talking gibberish adding the word platypus every now and then you will eventually start seeing them in your feed. Its rather quick too, I managed to get results within 10 minutes.

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 2 points 5 hours ago

There are multiple report voice record not even needed. Can infer behaviour and conversation without. Which honestly even scarier.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I still think it's bogus unless I see clear proof of it. That would imply your Instagram app somehow needs to bypass the kernel which let's the system know when the microphone is being used (some OS let's you know when mic or app is accessed real-time). That seems like an awfully open backdoor to microphone access.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Go try it out and let me know your results. Just for context I'm using GrapheneOS. And yeah I know some hardware backdoor would seem paranoid but consider the reach of said company.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago

I have, repeatedly, because it's not the first time I hear of this, only once did something similar to what I was saying appeared. Sounds like a coincidence to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tried getting directions to a restaurant from Google Maps yesterday and it routed me inefficiently through an intersection with a paid sponsor restaurant. This was the biggest enshittification of direction apps I’ve experienced. Not only did it give me worse directions, but what are the chances I need to stop at the paid restaurant when I am trying to get to another restaurant in 20 minutes?

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what are the chances I need to stop at the paid restaurant when I am trying to get to another restaurant in 20 minutes?

That's not the purpose though. This puts this other restaurant in your head for some other time. You may think you're not actually affected by this tactic, but decades of research shows that, even when aware of this, it still fucking works.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

So the only winning move is not to use Google

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've been looking for a new job. Now I get ads for jobs. That's actually nice, were it not that they're always the same five shitty jobs every time.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those are the five shitty jobs that paid for advertising.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't wakt to work for a company that recruits through advertising.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Been thinking, this is a common trope in anime (using glasses/other objects to try to hear through a barrier), does this actually work?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

also, using Google to search for a term/subject while watching a YouTube video that mentioned it

I searched the first four generic characters of something I'd never searched before, and the full subject popped right up as the suggestion

either the phone is listening, or they're cataloguing video content subjects. either way, building tons of data points on you

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

... hyper-realistic bedazzled dildo

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno about bedazzeld, but ummm... 👀

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Imagine how good it would look on your desk. The sack shining like two disco balls

Or you could hang it above the fireplace like that singing trout

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

If they have all this marketing intel about me why do they deluge me with ads for major appliances right after I buy them? I mean how likely am I gonna want another dishwasher the same week?

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think them having all this info about you, is a way to get advertisers to pay them more for the targeted ads.

It's not to help you or the advertisers, but themselves.

And I assume not a single advertiser has gone up to them with a well grounded: "bruh, dafuq are you doing showing fridge ads to the guy that just bought a fridge from us... that's not what we are paying you for."

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

From the manufacturer's point of view all they see/hear from big tech is "these fridge ads are very effective, see this guy who bought a fridge as evidence."

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago

Because they get paid to send ads to people who might be interested in Dishwashers.

Google/Instagram/Whatever (generally) doesn't make money when you buy a dishwasher.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I wish Google would put ~~so~~ all their ~~sitting~~ ~~soying~~ spying to ~~God~~ good ~~is~~ use to improve their text prediction on their ~~site~~ swipe input.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

I've actually turned off my autocomplete lately. It's become too annoying.. I'd rather make "your fingers are too fat"-mistakes than all the "God" and "ducking" every time. People only have to understamd about 80% of the words you write in order to understand the message. Si, a swnwnve kike thud id not thw ens og the wprld.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

They already accomplished that, phones in like 16 had chips that were capable of doing it all on device without needing the cloud, which isn't profitable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

But good luck getting anyone to sell you a dildo.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 22 hours ago

You must never imply ownership of the dildo.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just need to buy my plane tickets for noodling about with no direction of specific importance. Be mad if there was a wedding there too wouldn't it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›