What a legend. He's not even radical, but someone doing simple decent things seems radical when you're so used to the rot.
Pravda News!



Yeah, politicians like him should be norm and not the exception.
Make him the norm again - MHTNA!
Nope, that doesn't fly, although the motto is great.
Mamdani for Norm - MafoNo? Nah, that doesn't work either. But I agree with you, great Motto!
I can only imagine how much actual money is actually there to be taken, at the city, state and federal level if we just fucking enforced the rules.
If you include things like wage theft. Multiple Trillions.
Previous Mayor Adams was caught up in a corruption scandal.
Ex-governor Cuomo had to resign over a sex scandal.
The GOP candidate was a local joke shock jock.
Mamdani was very lucky to be the best in a a weak field, and yet barely got over half the vote.
He knew he had to hit the ground running.
Would 6 weeks be enough to give your drivers bathroom breaks? Or let them leave a burning warehouse? Or one that is in the path of a tornado? Not walk around the dead bodies of their fallen coworkers?
Ghouls on an unstable mountain of corpses shouldn't throw stones.
Ghouls on an unstable mountain of corpses shouldn't throw stones.
Why? No one has been holding them accountable for decades. There's no downside for them.
Umm, I'm old enough to remember mail order, when some things did take six weeks to arrive. And you know what? We survived, somehow. I'd gladly go back to that world, with living wages for workers, affordable food, affordable housing. I don't need cheap, plastic shit delivered in an hour to be happy.
In short, GFY Bezos.
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos
Bezos hasn't been CEO of Amazon for the past five years. Great reporting.
Yup, totally destroyed the credibility of the whole article.
/s
I mean yeah reporter could've used the right term but Bezos still runs Amazon. He's not separated from the company. Not sure why you have such an issue with the person using the term CEO vs chairman which in my opinion would be more confusing for the wider audience
In reality, the CEO has a much greater active role in a company. Calling Bezos the CEO of Amazon is both inaccurate and factually incorrect.
He's literally above the CEO he pays someone to do work he doesn't need to do anymore. But that doesn't mean he's not involved. He's still the guy in charge
That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.
Yes it is. CEO is more day to day, he just doesn't have to do that anymore. He's the Executive Chairman and I believe the largest shareholder as well. He's still completely active in the company.
Nobody in the world is going to misinterpret the difference between an executive chairman and a CEO. Neither you or I even know the specifics of what either role's specific duties are. It's literally irrelevant
I think you're not holding journalists to a high enough standard.
A journalists job is to translate information for the masses. I don't think referring to him as CEO is that damaging to the story
All that does is sensationalize it, which is inherently harmful.
Lmfao it literally doesn't and is not harmful at all. What possibly could be harmful about calling the executive chairman a CEO?
It's like mistaking the executive chef as the head chef or chef de cuisine.
From the outside nobody would know what the hell the difference is and to be honest it would be largely irrelevant.
Lies are harmful, end of story.
Stupidity, willful ignorance and splitting hairs is far more harmful.
You're the type that would be more upset people are calling someone a slave owner instead of a slave driver than the fact there are slaves at all. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater
This is the final thing I find necessary to say to you: Your kindergarten-level understanding of business does not affect reality.
Lmfao how childish.
"the reporter chose to be wrong because a flashy headline was more important"
But you can't eat clean air! What about the homeless! This is just what they want everypne mirandering around, like it even a shit to warrant. Doesn't even.
