Brazilian researchers have estimated the railway will directly lead to more than 1,500 square miles of deforestation, releasing 75 million tons of carbon, and that broader environmental impacts will affect an area of roughly 19,000 square miles, bigger than the state of Connecticut.
this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)
Climate
8669 readers
322 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know nothing about this particular case. But trains are usually MUCH better for the environment than trucks, which is what they apparently use today. The articles I'm finding make it sound like the train tracks are gong to parallel the existing roads, so shouldn't be a significant incursion to the wildlife.
If this was really a 1:1 exchange, environmentalists ought to be supporting this. I note they are not, which means something's not adding up.
The are shrinking the protected areas along the railway - the whole thing is obviously not just about the train but about clearing more forest for soy farms (and making the process more profitable because trains are indeed MUCH more cost efficient than trucks)
I think the expectation is not that it's a 1:1 exchange but that the train moves a lot more cattle feed, resulting in deforestation of a larger area when what needs to happen is a restoration of areas currently under cultivation to rain forest
Induced demand doesn't just apply to freeways
Frontiers and railways: inseparable.
The project is supported in large part by major soy traders, including the American grain giant Cargill. Cargill and the Brazilian developers argue the railway is essential for economic growth in the region and is part of a broader effort in the northern Amazon to improve infrastructure and facilitate grain exports.
Won't the activists think of the profits?! /S