this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
110 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43004 readers
26 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago

IRC prank from the 2000s: if you type /quit playing games with my heart you'll hear a cool pop song.

2020s: if you type quit into Google it will understand this as an AI prompt.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Well of course, how else would a chatbot react? Do people really "use" this, intentionally?

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 6 points 4 days ago

Google claims they do. During their last presentation, they boasted about billions of users of their AI. The sheer gall of these people!

[–] lath@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

Yes, default users "use" this because it's helpful, until it's not.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's an extension called Disable AI that gets rid of those intrusive Google Search AI "replies". I strongly recommend people to use it, because… seriously, they are convincing but misleading trash.

The two phonemic transcriptions of "disregard" in the first picture are a prime example of that. I could go on a full rant about it, but to keep it short: compare them with the ones provided by Wiktionary, and play "spot the differences". (Bonus points if you also play "spot the undeclared assumptions".)

[–] samwise_gamgee@beehaw.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

You can also change it in the settings. Look for "search assist"; values are "never", "on demand", "sometimes", and "often".

But yeah, to be frank I use mostly DDG nowadays, I focused on Google due to the OP.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ublock origin -> block element

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 10 points 4 days ago

Browser settings -> search engine -> literally anywhere else

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FYI when I tried Kagi's Quick Answer out of curiosity, even that gave me a dictionary definition for "disregard". That being the case, I'd trust it about as much as I trust Google's AI overviews (which is to mean "not at all"). It just doesn't show up for me unless I prompt it.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

FWIW just searching Kagi (the way someone searched Google here) yields a dictionary definition "provided by WordsAPI". So it's actually

  • trustworthy
  • predictable
  • fast
  • energy-efficient

You can't say any of those things about AI.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

Normally, yes. That always seems to be one of the results.

I specifically forced it to do a quick answer, and it still gave me a definition. Interestingly, for "disregard", it also covered a bit about the Google nonsense results after defining the word.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i dont understand why go through so many hoops just to use shitty search engine, is using google really worth that?

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

It just has more of the web in its index than competitors do, so there are good practical reasons on occasion.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 1 points 4 days ago

None of these are working for me, except maybe skip which just displays results without the AI box.