this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
270 points (98.9% liked)

Flippanarchy

2521 readers
946 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This has kind of happened in reality. Is this a coincidence or a specific reference to it?

The below image is a famous Australian snap of two politicians smoking a cigar after delivering one of the least popular budgets (big political moment in Aus each year) in living memory. Left is Matthias Corman, Right is Joe Hockey.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It’s about the Australian budget and has Joe smoking a cigar at the bottom. It has to be a direct reference.

Surely it is.

The other day, one of my bosses said that they no longer wish to hire people who come from wealth, as they make poor employees. They call in sick and dont miss the money and can leave at a drop of a hat. They also found they had stronger boundaries and wouldn't accept the poor working conditions other people had to put up with. Although, they were at least self aware enough not to use those exact words.

Of course, I wasn't in a position to say anything out loud but, to myself, I was thinking "why yes, that is a scathing critique of capitalism you have there."

[–] mmmberry@beehaw.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I read a book last year on homelessness and one focus was on extended stay hotels. In my own ignorance, I hadn't thought about them being used in place of regular housing. Because people can't qualify for mortgages or pull together a deposit for an apartment, they end up spending so much more paying week to week while having less rights and a less stable community.

After finishing the book, I remember thinking how the US is just perfectly set up to profit from desperate people. I'm really lucky and escaped poverty, but I remember my mom taking payday loans, just the overwhelming worry that came from barely having enough, and the panic attacks I had each semester of college as I cobbled together a means to pay tuition.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Revolving debt is a trap. Don't get caught in it.

It sucks that there's very little alternative option for some people. Sometimes you need to bite the bullet and take on debt. And then you have to repay the debt in addition to daily life, which can easily lead to more debt, and so on and so on indebtfinitely.

Not talking about free debt. I'm big on getting free money when inflation is so high....something I need now, or even want now (and can afford), and 0% offer for same price? Fuck yeah take the 0%. $200 now is worth like $210 within a year. I'd much rather pay $17/mo for a year than pay an extra $10 for the same item next year.

Assuming of course, you can and do pay it on time each month. Don't want to get hit with the deferred interest or you're worse off than you would've started.

[–] mmmberry@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

I think pay day loans should be illegal. They are so predatory! But I also understand the desperation. If we had a better social support system, it wouldn't be an issue. But then people wouldn't be making as much money. Can't have that.

Not even the best years of Democrats have offered any real growth of the middle class, it's been shrinking it actively too.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Good reasons to never support Liberal, or expect Labor to ever change anything meaningfully.

JobSeeker from next months raise (which NewStart was collapsed into) is 24% of the median male wage (women earning $424 less).