this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
202 points (98.1% liked)

Flippanarchy

2521 readers
699 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 74 points 1 week ago

Do you have any idea how little that narrows it down?!

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

hmm UK, US, France, Canada and a whole lot more fit that bill. I thought Orwell was trying to warn us, but in reality he was a prophet.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

wake up babe, new religion just dropped

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

It's not that he was a prophet. It's that people used 1984 as a manual

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's clearly not the US because we've been a failed democracy and a police state for a long time.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 18 points 1 week ago

America? The UK? Germany?

[–] SatansDaughter@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let me guess, is it... All of them

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Not Spain (for the time being)

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Country name includes "Democratic Republic"

Looks Inside

Literal police state

Conclusion: Shut the fuck up about democracy and republics if you want to have one.

/s
[–] Furbag@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago

A nation so democratic, that they intentionally designed their system to have electors vote on your behalf because they believed the common man was too stupid to properly participate in democracy.

And then they never changed that winning formula!

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

the most democratic nations according to The Economist Democracy Index, getting a score of 9.00 or more out of ten are: Every nordic country new zealand ireland seitzerland netherlands

united states is a flawed democracy with a score of 7.65, the score has been only decreasing since 2006

wikipedia source

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

jeez, I didnt know this issue was THAT widespread

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Capitalism breeds fascism 🤷

[–] tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

not necessarily , most fascist countries are actually socialist

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really? I'll bite. Name 3, and please note that:

  1. Fascism and authoritarian are different
  2. I'll need your definition of socialism, and "because the PRC said so" doesn't change the material conditions of the nation. Just as the DPRK being called that doesn't make it democratic.
[–] tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Israel WWII Germany WWII Italy also the west used to call the al-baath party a "fascist party" because its a socialist party

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do I need to point at the so "North Korea is a democracy because it has democracy in the name" sign again?

Yes, the Nazis had some socialist leanings in the early days - but they were all eliminated once the Nazis came to power cementing them with Hitlers more pro-capital and anti-socialist side of the party rather than the more economically socialist Strasserites. So weren't the government of the Nazi Reich, and out of the way long before the Second World War.

Mussolini's PNF are a more interesting and murky choice, as Mussolini came from and had some more left wing views, and even though they crimibalised strikes they did at least give more heed to resolving class conflict - albeit as fascists do by conquest.

Israel is a good shout, and it was much more socialist back in its early days. Sadly, since the economic reforms of 85 with its privatisation of state services, cuts, and general adoption of neoliberal economic policy I don't think counts as Socialist... And it only really got full fascy after then, the assassination of the leader in the 90s for the Oslo Accords and following elections makes a good mark for Israel turning unapologetically fascist I think

[–] tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

israel was always fascist , the entire zionist ideology is fascist !

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 week ago

Zionism, especially it's modern incarnation: sure.

But there was a struggle for Israel's soul that fascism won, due to that Zionist influence. But it needn't have necessarily won.

It was fascist in its paramilitary early days, too. But that also predated the state.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Nie wieder Wehrpflicht!