this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
649 points (99.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

4626 readers
653 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I'm sure some private entity will take care of that. /s

[โ€“] Etterra@discuss.online 33 points 1 day ago

Fucking Regan, that jackass is most of the reason we're saddle with the Orange Jackass now. Deregulate this ๐Ÿ–•

Just picked this up the other day. Fitting.

[โ€“] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

WHY CANT WE HAVE MORE PEOPLE LIKE THIS IN LEADERSHIP POSITIONS YARGHHHHHHHHJ

i know why. I just need to scream.

[โ€“] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

With Mandami, people voted in the primary, selected a progressive, and then he won in the general election.

Vote in the primaries. That's the whole trick.

[โ€“] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember that the party interferes with the primaries. Any progressive that wins has to successfully fight both parties.

[โ€“] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All you have to do to defeat that is to fucking vote. Bernie lost the Presidential primaries in 2016 ans 2020 because more people voted for Clinton and Biden.

Yeah, there was talk about them rigging the 2016 primary for Clinton with the superdelegates if Bernie was ahead, but it never reached that point because Clinton secured the nomination before the convention.

I teach at a university and I had a ton of students praising Bernie who couldn't be assed to change their registration to a local address or drive home for a day to vote for him. And then they refused to vote in the general because they were protesting that the person they couldn't be bothered to vote for didn't win the nomination.

[โ€“] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I caucused for Bernie both times. The first time, Clinton's staffers misdirected and intimidated a bunch of Bernie supporters to stand on her side of the room. No one realized what had happened until after the count was taken, but by then it was too late, and the person running the caucus turned a deaf ear to our complaints. We were told that we'd be thrown out/arrested if we continued to make a disturbance.

The second time, we didn't have enough people for Bernie to be considered a "viable" candidate, and that's only because the people from the Biden side of the room convinced half of our group that we were not viable (we were, but that was the first caucus for most of the Bernie supporters and they didn't know how it worked)

If you're not familiar with caucuses, I don't blame you; they are an antiquated, easily manipulated system that needs to be thrown out.

[โ€“] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

All you have to do to defeat that is to fucking vote.

And in places where the party's fuckery succeeds, you'll pretend that the primaries are fair because you like the results.

Yeah, there was talk about them rigging the 2016 primary for Clinton with the superdelegates if Bernie was ahead, but it never reached that point because Clinton secured the nomination before the convention.

The party successfully argued in court that it could decide the nominee in a smoke filled room without the input of the voters if it wanted. Then it did just that in 2024. And you pretend it was fair because a genocide candidate was nominated.

[โ€“] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The establishment Dems didn't support Mandami, but he still won in the primaries. You know why? Because people showed up to vote.

[โ€“] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

How many have lost because the party plays favorites?

Who showed up to vote for harris in the primaries we were cheated out of?

The results of crooked primaries are not reliably indicative of the electorate's will.

[โ€“] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Who said it was fair? But you've got to use every tool at your disposal. Don't make it easy for them.

[โ€“] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Centrists argue that we should ignore progressives and point to primary losses as a reason.

Primaries centrists run dishonestly for their own benefit.

[โ€“] MisterD@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For newbies: "the primary" in the US is the selection process for who you get to vote for in the coming election.

Democrats and Republicans each have their own primary to select a candidate for the district where you live.

I would phrase it as:

Each party sends a candidate to compete in the general election. The primary elections are the party's internal elections to decide who their candidate is.

In the United States, elections for the office of the Presidency are held every four years. Fun fact: the first few elections, the winner of the race got to be the president, and the runner up was made the vice president. The great experiment in democracy yielded data: That doesn't fucking work! So the candidates for vice president are selected by the presidential candidates during the campaign cycle. As a major job of the president is to appoint people, this is the free sample you get. They then run as a pair, the vice presidential candidates are often called "running mates." These get a lot of attention, you'll hear these called Major Elections. The next one is still tentatively scheduled for 2028.

Congress...is kinda fucking stupid. But also, the term "congressman" refers strictly to members of the House of Representatives; members of the upper house are addressed as "senator." Congressmen serve 2 year terms with no term limits. We re-elect the entire lower house every 2 years, almost to a man. Half of those elections line up with a presidential election, the ones that don't are often called "Midterm elections." There is a mid-term this year.

The Senate is even weirder, senators serve 6 year terms, and every two years a third of the senate is up for re-election. From an individual state's perspective, that means one of your senators is up during one election, the other one is up two years later, and then neither is up two years after that. Because 100 isn't divisible by 3, there's an exception to that somewhere, I'm not sure where it is off the top of my head.

It gets a little complicated because each party, the Democrats, Republicans, and The United Collective Of Parties That Are Allowed To Exist Because Of The First Amendment Assembly Clause But Not Allowed To Matter, and each state, are allowed to choose how their primaries (and their elections) work.

In many states, such as my home state of North Carolina, a primary election looks like the main election, The party issues a paper ballot, you bubble with a pen and insert into the box. Other states have "caucuses" where you go to a big room and vote by physically sitting in the area designated for the candidate you support. Some parties in some states welcome anyone to participate, some allow only registered members of that party to participate. Such is life in a federation.

Most, I think all, states also line up their own elections with the Federal elections. So every two years you walk into the polls for a 1/2 chance of voting for a President and vice president, 2/3 chance of voting for 1 senator, 1 congressman, quite possibly a governor, lieutenant governor, general assemblyman, state senator, county commissioner, sheriff, district judge, town mayor, 3-7 school board members, dog catcher and village idiot.

[โ€“] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at it another way - last year we didn't have Mamdani, now we do. We didn't used to have AOC or Pramila Jayapal, but now we do. Progress happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] SkabySkalywag@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Fuckin' master shot. Far right uses Reagan to dog whistle and trigger the Boomers, well so can Mamdani manipulate those Boomers. Excellent work.

load more comments (7 replies)
[โ€“] osanna@lemmy.vg 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they should just be billionaires instead. have they tried pulling themselves up by their bootstraps?

[โ€“] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I can't even find my bootstraps.

[โ€“] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Quoting myself from another post with that topic:
Mamdani's plans and actions are almost too good to be true, but true they are and they are more than a silver lining for a lot of people.
People like him are so desperately needed in the world of robber billionaires enslaving the whole world.
Those robber billionaires might not realize that yet, but people like Mamdani are going to save their lives by nibbling at their looted fortune.
And if the Mamdanis of this world fail, we can always resort to eating the billionaires.

[โ€“] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, people were joking that the media outlets were afraid of Mamdani getting elected because he would fail as a mayor of one of the largest cities in the world. But what they were actually afraid of is him succeeding using socialist policies.

[โ€“] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Socialism is what most people love, yet some in all but name.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

I love Mamdani, and his existence in office gives me hope for the world, but it's not just because he's helping New Yorkers.

He also demonstrates proof of concept:

  1. Socialist policies are popular: people like him.
  2. Socialist policies are electable: he got voted in.
  3. Socialist policies work: people are materially benefitting, and NYC's finances have quantifiably improved.
  4. Anti-socialist propaganda has been bullshit from the start: he's not some shady two-faced evil maniac like the pigs from animal farm (those are the capitalists). He literally means what he says and puts his money where his mouth is, and you can see it every day by his actions.

Altogether, this can encourage more people to run on socialist policies, especially for local offices in progressive strongholds, but it can seep outward as it catches on.

It can also encourage the DNC (especially with the new chairman) and elected democrats to support/endorse candidates who run on a progressive agenda. No more hesitancy over whether that's an electable platform: clearly it is.

Lastly, it can encourage voters to support these candidates because instead of fearing the big scary "Socialism" word, they can see what it actually is and what it does and they think "Gee, I want what NYC has in my city/town."

Taken alongside the upcoming election which will be absolutely punishing to republicans, and people's disenchantment with establishment Dems and their corporatist policies, this can honestly represent a sea-change in the political landscape of the US, which as we know bleeds out into the rest of the world.

What we're experiencing now with the resurgence of fascism is like the birthing pains of a new era: "The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born."

That dying old world is putting up a vicious fight, but it's like an injured leopard: dangerous, to be sure, and doubly-so in its desperation; but it won't be long before it perishes.

[โ€“] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those robber billionaires might not realize that yet, but people like Mamdani are going to save their lives by nibbling at their looted fortune.

You know, if I was a billionaire, I would quite literally want democratic socialists in charge because I'd feel safer if the entire goddamn population didn't have a reason to kill me for my monies.

It's not so much that we don't have inequality in Europe, but in most countries, even if you work minimum wage and barely get by, you can get sick, have to go to a hospital for treatment, pay nearly nothing out of pocket, and your time off work is also compensated.

People are a lot less desperate for change when a single health issue won't derail their entire lives. When people are less desperate, they're less likely to shoot rich people too. Let's not forget that Luigi, who may or may not have killed that UHC CEO, had chronic back pain requiring surgery. In his 20s. He came from a well-off family, but chances are his condition is/was going to cost him hundreds of thousands over his lifetime WITH insurance anyway.

[โ€“] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago

Yeah like I don't actually understand what people in the united states have to lose anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 96 points 2 days ago (26 children)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ