this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
390 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29802 readers
1894 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 119 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So, does this mean Trump is officially declaring the US a fascist state?

[–] Embargo@lemmy.zip 42 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm comfortable reading it like this.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I wouldn’t say I’m comfortable, exactly. I agree it is the proper reading-between-the-lines, and it’s very awkward. Actually, down right terrifying.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

well... time to respond accordingly I guess

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Yep. Any time now, would be great.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We need to be doing everything legally possible right now to get him the fuck out. That's what I'll say.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We need to be lawful and civilized.

Can't say the same for some radical rando with an AR-15

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I actually heard it succinctly explained by Graham Plattner the other day (I think on The Daily podcast), and I'll probably muck it up but: When people aren't given the power to bring change the right way within the system because the billionaires have rigged it for themselves, it makes that small percentage of people who are naturally inclined towards violence to take matters into their own hands.

That's why we're seeing an increase in stochastic violence. It's not some organized resistance cell, but just a random dude who maybe would've committed other crimes at a different time that picks up a rifle and tries to solve what he sees as the biggest problem facing him today.

load more comments (2 replies)

He already did that a while ago. NSPM-7 is nothing new, neither is repeatedly ignoring court orders, trying to overthrow the 2020 election, or personally enriching himself to the tune of billions of dollars using the power of the government he runs.

[–] NewDark@lemmy.today 46 points 5 days ago
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 100 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Tyrants don't come to power by mandating submission. They come to power by criminalizing dissent.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Same shit, different nomenclature.

Fuck that fascist

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 6 points 5 days ago

Nobody young enough for that would spell 'nomenclature' properly.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Criminalizing the opposition is literally the first page in the fascism handbook.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 43 points 5 days ago

Authoritarianism is an admission of abject weakness.

White supremacists are the weakest and most brittle snowflakes.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Get ready for the updated Ai powered House Un-American Committee. Now with more fascism!

Brought to you by Palantir.

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 43 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Well I guess the only response it to become a Satanist, pto-LGBTQ2+, anarchist

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

You weren't already?

I low key actually am. And I'm armed

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 6 points 5 days ago

Or a humanist pro-LGBTQ anarchist

(I know you know Satan isn't real; the God-fearing Christians do not)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sounds unconstitutional. He's promising to persecute people for their protected first amendment activities.

Thanks to the supreme court it doesn't matter though, as nationwide injunctions are forbidden.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)
[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago

There are legit people who think that some pieces of paper can stop an authorian takeover.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 5 days ago

Neutralize this, 🖕, fuckface.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Just nazi no vibes

[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 5 days ago

The same people who say "Nazis were socialists, it's in the name!" Will go on to say "Antifa is a terrorist racist group!"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Secular does not mean what most of these assholes think it means, by the way. Way too many act like it's a synonym for "atheist".

Just because a person or an org has not chosen to wear their chosen lifestyle on their sleeve does not make it the equivalent atheist.

Most of life is "secular", FFS.

What the conservatives do the English language is as infuriating as so many other things they do. Often it starts with their perversion of terms and phrases.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What the conservatives do the English language is as infuriating as so many other things they do. Often it starts with their perversion of terms and phrases.

well put.

Carlin said: By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth.

[–] 1D10@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

They know what it means, they are leaving room for violent christian political groups. They have already declared violent Islamic organizations as evil so by saying "secular" they literally mean any group that does not declare themselves as christian.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 24 points 5 days ago

Im right here ... try me.

The US sucks ass right now, we need to tax the billionaires back down to millionaires. We need to get money out of politics and punish the corrupt. If it cant be done through legal channels then do it with guillotines.

Also ...something something what about the Epstein files?

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

Demented old pedophiles shouldn't be saying shit. Burn in hell you fat old rapist fuck.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

First they came for the immigrants and we did nothing...

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 17 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Oh yeah? Well I'm gonna anarchist harder.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I believe there have been plenty of right wing attacks that are not accounted for, because they were done by the federal government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh no! Radical pro-transgenders want to trans their genders, please save me from the genders transing

Question: Where are the victims of these secular political groups and radical transgenders? To compare them to 9-11 mass murderers seems kinda wonky to me. Drug cartels also don't seem as bad, somebody has to get me drugs.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In truth? The "victims" they are protecting, are the proud boys, the 3 % ers, patriot front, etc. They are targeting the groups that have fought back against their aspiring paramilitaries they want to use to target opponents and critics.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago

we are at war

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So start a religion that is aggressively pro-trans? Even better if you appear to be Christian?

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Episcopal Church welcomes you.

We're not perfect, but we're trying; we have openly Queer (including trans clergy) and have re-written our canon on marriage to include same-sex marriage. I'm a priest in this church. Never imagined that the Trans flag that is hanging on my wall in my office (given to me by a fellow demonstrator at a No Kings protest last year) would possibly land me in jail some day.

But seriously, at this point it is the duty of any Christian, if they truly believe in Jesus, to stand with Trans folks and proclaim anti-fascism. Because this is where Jesus would be standing.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was raised episcopal as a kid. Episcopalian on my mom's side, Catholic on my dad's. This was in the 1970s and early 80s. I remember our church would invite this particular female pastor to give a guest sermon on a regular basis. And in that era it was radical for a woman to be a minister.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago
[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

Well I'm sorry to all the transgender people impacted by anarchists lack of action in 2024.

You dont deserve to be targeted.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Come at me, bro

load more comments
view more: next ›