this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
314 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

59850 readers
413 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lots of layoffs ("re-evaluating our operational footprint") and switching to "agentic" processes. Target user is AI.

Anyone still hosting Gitlab?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 91 points 1 month ago

Just like everyone has already done I'd also recommend Codeberg/ForgejoπŸ‘Œ

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is every mother fucker just going bat shit insane this year? Goddamn it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 64 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Oh god that is so cringe. Just getting into coding i have no idea what to use as an online repo. I dont want to use github because microsoft but i want the basic repo collaboration features to be available cloning, pull requests, issues etc.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 110 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you don't want to host something yourself, check codeberg

[–] pluge@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I like codeberg and have no plans on migrating away from it, but their codeberg Pages product is...weak to say the least. There's very frequent downtime. I had multiple users reach out to me letting me know my site was down... embarrassing. I set up kuma uptime checks on it, and now I see when the outages happen.

Forget "four 9's" or anything close to that....my 30 day uptime is a measley 91%...

[–] sonstwas@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They communicate that openly tho:

Regular maintenance window: We're meeting every Tuesday starting 18.00 Berlin time (currently 17.00 UTC), lasting up to 8 hours. While we announce large scheduled downtimes in advance, there might be minor interruptions due to maintenance work happening during the meeting. Please be patient in this case.

https://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg

Not sure if that's also for the Pages feature, but in general having a weekly 8hr maintenance window is not optimal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Legianus@programming.dev 63 points 1 month ago (35 children)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Codeberg for hosted, Forgejo for selfhosted.

They are great.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Codeberg or sourcehut.

Gitlab was always cringe.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. Software will be built by machines, directed by people.
  1. The agentic era multiplies demand for software. As the cost of producing software collapses, demand for it will expand.

objectively insane.

Governance built into the core.

I still believe that's not possible, but that's only my opinion.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As the cost of producing software collapses, demand for it will expand.

This part actually makes sense. Plenty of software doesn't get written because it's just easier or cheaper to do without it. It's why BPM tools exist. Simplify the coding process and you can solve problems more cheaply.

I also think this will kill BPM tools. Why use BPM tooling when creating a real app is just as easy and more customizable?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

lol I just created my gitlab account today to get away from github and after reading this the account has been scheduled for deletion and now I have a new account with Codeberg. When are these dipshits going to learn that we don't want AI in our workflows? I am capable of breaking things on my own, but at least when I break things I will learn from it.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't think that they've used enough buzzwords.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Increased buzzword utilization is part of their go forward strategy that begins implementation in Q3 pending socialization of relevant KPI. obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This reads almost like a parody.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 26 points 1 month ago

The only large mainstream competitor, which would probably benefit from github's troubles: "We saw github breaking itself regularly because of it's own slop coding AND flooded with trash vibe coded projects and thought - that's where we wanna be!"

[–] vane@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Gitlab CEO - 16 years in Microsoft, Gitlab CTO - 13 years in Microsoft
Can we say Microsoft Gitlab ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TAG@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ouch. My company was just about to start moving over to GitLab off of Atlassian.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That makes sense, since Gitlab seems to be trying to challenge Atlassian. In who manages to make worse software...

[–] Ophrys@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

We use atlassian at my job and I hate it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sleepmode@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

They endlessly tooted their horn about their diversity and fully remote operations. So this is pretty rich.

β€œThis isn’t cost cutting” Oh, fuck off. This is trimming the fat before they try to look for a buyer again.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago

I always love to see companies do this with a semi open source product with investors

The code gets closed, a small clump of users split off, make their own version with beet and hookers, and soon the vast majority of the users following because the real open source one is so awesome

That was jellyfin's story, but this is a variation on that and I've seen this story many times now

Bye bye gitlab,rest in pieces

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sucks, I manage GitLab in our company and it’s been difficult to maintain already without the vibe coded shit updates that break everything. I’ll need to see what are our options our but my assumption is that there aren’t any.

[–] laserjet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The enterprise features we rely on do not exist in Forgejo last time I checked (8 months ago). Maybe it improved. Hell, my company would probably even be onboard moving to Forgejo if we can get a support contract with them and some of the enterprise features we rely upon (SCIM being the main one).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some examples of the mindset we expect every team member to embody:

  • I take pride in my work because it delivers real outcomes

fucking drones

I care deeply for the customer and the business health

Sure bud

[–] the_wise_wolf@feddit.org 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is why we built and released the Duo Agent Platform in January. Our first quarter adoption is promising, and we're ready to accelerate.

This is so weird. They gave a Duo presentation at our company and I was a bit second hand embarrassed because it's just bad.

Anyway, the stock price will probably go up after this announcement...

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All I see is layoffs and creating office space to force people to go to office. Well RIP Gitlab.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Forgejo is great.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 19 points 1 month ago

The only upside I see is their stock has fallen since this announcement. Perhaps the market is finally getting that companies pushing AI isn't a universal good thing?

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ok what are we going to call them now? Gitslop? Sloplab?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Still hosting gitlab.

The CI on forgejo is, unfortunately, nowhere near as good.

Given how long gitlab has been struggling to fix basic bugs and instead creeping into features - hello-oo bloated and slow vscode-like web editor and non-ephemeral runner management - I'm not sure they have any staff left to let go. But it's nice they found an excuse to shed their remaining talent and avoid complete stock devaluation.

The planning is happening openly, including a voluntary separation window.

"We don't understand how the Dead Sea Effect works, and we want to super-size the damage.". Okay, Bill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago

An almost inevitable result of venture capital, IMHO.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We are uniquely positioned to not only participate, but to lead in our category where the TAM is exploding at a step function rate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] esc@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gitlab and gitlab-ci really are great and easy to support with little problems as long as you update regularly. It really does look cringe, but they always were chasing current dumb thing relentlesly.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah I like them as well, it's what we use at work. The article doesn't leave me optimistic though

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί