this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
353 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84478 readers
3585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 1 points 32 minutes ago

Not thick enough.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is not about smart glasses.

holding a glass slab in front of someone’s face is a lot more likely to be clocked.

So pervert blackmailers switch to button cameras. They are cheaper and even less obvious than thick black ray bans.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

So pervert blackmailers switch to button cameras. T

It is entirely about smart glasses. button cameras have been around for AGES. But they have shit lenses and crap sensors; these fucking chodes want to up the production value on the nonconsensual porn they already shoot with their phones - on the stairs up skirts, down the blouses of women, etc.,

they want a head cam with better resolution and head tracking.

keep advocating for the perverts

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If you act like a twat, you can be called out online. But only affects you if you online.

Im not online anywhere, except here. And this place sucks and has 4 users, and if it gets better/bigger im leaving.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I got a tour of a military base with a guy who was wearing smart glasses and I couldn't fucking believe that someone didn't grab them off his face and break them in half. I was being VERY careful to ask if I was permitted to take pictures in some places (in at least one of which where the answer was No), and this dude was cruising around like Boris Badunov trying to gather secrets.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Might be a good time to tell someone.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I DID tell the guide what he was wearing because I didn't want us to end up in a military detention cell but the guide was like "Eh, it's fine," so I guess it was, but boy it didn't feel like it should have been!

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

it was fine because guide probably didnt understand the concept of glasses being able to record stuff, otherwise it would have been fine for you to take pictures too.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 7 hours ago

Maybe he was taken aside and questioned afterwards, hopefully. Or, rather, they don't show critical infrastructure to strangers at all.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Well in that case the guide should be on the line for the fuckup

[–] UniversalRecord@discuss.online 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Smart glasses are probably where the privacy debate around AI becomes truly mainstream. Phones are visible, wearable AI cameras are much harder for people to recognize in real time. It feels like society is heading toward a major legal and ethical adjustment period.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 hour ago

A person can already LOOK anywhere they want, and almost every inch of ground is covered by surveillance cameras that are recording your every move.

This just combines two things that are already happening. When it gets to court, I doubt a judge is going to care much.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Smart glasses have absolutely nothing to do with AI. They're just cameras.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

I think AI granting the ability for nearly anyone to easily manipulate short videos in a way that looks realistic might be where it comes into the picture.

Having video evidence of everything you do is just unsettling at the very least if you ask me.

[–] UniversalRecord@discuss.online 6 points 9 hours ago

Meta AI smart glasses exist, doesn’t it?

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

I swear if someone approaches me with these glasses they're going to find out just how fragile those frames are.

[–] mokey@therock.fraggle-rock.org 2 points 4 hours ago

We have a real baddy here. So tough.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›