this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
137 points (97.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39430 readers
1456 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What's a common "fact" that's spread around that's actually not true and pisses you off that too many people believe it?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I got another one. It bugs me when people say that it's not possible for two dark haired people to produce a blonde child. These people think they're so smart because they know genetics exist. But if they learned anything about genetics at all, very basic punnet square genetics you learn in highschool biology explains why it's not only possible but pretty common. If both dark haired parents are carriers for the blonde gene, there is a 25% chance of a blonde child. And reality is probably more complex than what I learned in highschool.

It's like the stubborn fuckers who refuse to accept the science of sex and gender being any more complex that "penis man vagina woman". They think they're so smart for knowing "basic" biology and refuse to fucking learn anything beyond that.

There are many genes that affect the color of our hair and skin. Dark colors are caused by higher amounts of melamine in hair/skin. Those darker traits are dominant genes. In the same vein, two black people can have a child that will have lighter skin than them if the parents carry recessive genes and pass them on.

But it is even more complex than that because there are so many factors that affect the expressivity of genes : the environment, the diet or even other genes.

And don't get me started on genre/sex... Biology is sooo complex, and genetics is just one of its branch, but people want to believe it's simple to justify their bigotry. I studied biology for two years at university and I just know that I know practically nothing about it...

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump was good for the economy.

During the election this kept being repeated even though the economy collapsed because of his covid response

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

thats just pure propaganda spread by MSM in the hopes he would get re-elected. propaganda is more aggressive than Disinformation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thrawn@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The persistent myth that corporations are legally required to act only in the service of shareholders’ financial interests.

Powerful groups have a vested interest in keeping the myth around, but it doesn’t even pass the smell test— they were more interested in social control with the return to office stuff. Even though productivity is higher and costs are lower with WFH. Even if you argued it served the interest of shareholders as a broad class, without checking for the real estate holdings of the company’s shareholders, they could accidentally assist companies that their shareholders don’t have investments in. Or worse, competing ones.

It goes further. Why not treat employees better to reduce turnover or improve performance? No, of course not. It is used exclusively to justify immoral actions.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So a lot of that changed when the law changed that capped ceo salary at $1M. They started getting comp in stock. So of course when they say they only have a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders they really mean to themselves.

Everyone was all yay CEO salaries were out of control so we got them capped. But look at the monster the side effect of that created.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CEOs are literally not a problem compared to the billionaires who own these companies. CEOs are still bad, but they are henchmen, not the main villains.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Difference without much distinction.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I only bring it up because people seem to focus on CEOs without thinking about the bigger system behind why CEOs are such garbage.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Hairs grow longer, thicker and darker when you cut them.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh plenty...


The myth of "alpha wolves" and all the men who build a toxic social and psychological image of themselves and other men because of it, apparently because they would like to live in a zoo and get into conflicts with other men they have never met before or something.

But seriously, there were some grave errors in how this came to be. This wasn't observing wolves in their natural environment. There are no "alpha wolves" in nature. The researcher, David Mech, who was in part responsible for this stupidity has been working since then to correct this, but media and society already swallowed the misconception too hard.


Next one:
"LLMs are not AI." Yes, they are. AI is a scientific label for a bunch of methods, algorithms, and models.
"But they are not 'intelligent'." My dear fellow flesh bag, we do not even have a clear definition of what 'intelligence' even is. Come up with a good one, then let's talk about this particular label. Until then, you can rename AI to 'pesto alfredo' for all I care as long as we agree what kind of methods we mean by that to categorize a bunch of computer science stuff.

In the opposite corner:
"We have achieved AGI with LLMs". No, we have not. There is still a substantial lack of capabilties and properties.

Or: "LLMs are sentient and self-aware". To the best of my knowledge, they are not. To be fair, there is little room for debate, which often boils down to stuff like semantic arguments about consciousness and definitions of understanding, but the consensus is that they are not.


Another one:
"Homeopathy cures diseases." No, it doesn't. It has a placebo effect but that's pretty much about it.


There is more:
"Evolution theory is just a 'theory'." No, it's a proven set of explanations and models supported by overwhelming empirical evidence. Popular confusion of the colloquial use of the word "theory" with the scientific one.

Colloquial meaning: a guess, hunch, speculation, or unproven idea.

Scientific meaning: a well-substantiated explanatory framework supported by extensive evidence and capable of being tested and potentially falsified.


And there is even more, but I have already written a wall of text and am tired now.

People think theory = hypothesis. A theory is something proven, which started as a hypothesis...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tryptophan makes you sleepy on Thanksgiving.

Large doses of Tryptophan can make you sleepy, but the amount you get in turkey doesn't come close. Thanksgiving meals make you sleepy because you eat a huge meal. Eat a huge meal without turkey and you will be tired, eat a normal sized meal with turkey and you won't be more tired than any other meal.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yup its the insulin/high blood sugar levels that are causing it. its more significant in people who have type 2 or prediabetes. people have reporting sleepiness after a large meal, especially if it includes alot of carbs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Marginal Tax brackets drive me insane especially my parents constantly misunderstand and think a payrise will make them lose money.

They don't understand that the tax is only paid on the money earned in that bracket. So going up 5% isn't your total income being taxed an extra 5% its only the money earned on that bracket that is taxed at the higher rate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip 56 points 2 days ago (7 children)

That food stamps or any handouts at all are a serious problem. Our (the US) government launches a single bomb that's worth years of food support. Idgaf if the food stamp recipients never do a damn thing but watch TV. I'd much rather millions of people doing that than bombing brown people half a world away.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Additionally, it's been proven in scientific study time and time again that giving people enough money to meet their needs significantly reduces crime and costs significantly less money than the "traditional" approach like inflating police budgets. Literally giving people cash money reduces crime better than any other way you could use the money.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

then it wont be able to fund MIC, Prison industries, or low wage. thats why they attack or neglect education funding, and drive culture wars to make jobs pay less by providing billionaires more benefits.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

New cars are reliable.

First of all, no. Their more complex and failure prone, and you are the guinea pig they test new crap on.

Second of all, you literally cannot call a one year old vehicle reliable. You do not have enough data to make that claim. My jeep is about 40 years old, and with the 40 year old head start will still out live a brand new jeep. It has no "limp mode" because u slipped out of 4 lo in the woods (actual customer example), and it doesn't require Internet connection + a security gateway authentication to reset things like limp mode and doing a clutch position relearn. If you want a reliable vehicle get something made between 85 and 05, as long as it doesn't rust out from underneath you it will give u less headaches than anything made in the last 20 years.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

People who think cheap Chinese vehicles will be reliable: there is no data to support this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"survival of fittest "was not coined by DARWIN, it was by herbert who co-opt his research.

Chronic lyme does not exist as a disease, and its coined by non-scientist which has snowballed into a large industry(providing questionable testing, LYME DOCTORA) by providing services that is equivalent to pseudoscience AND Belief its in more than 1 country, eventhough its mostly found deer ticks in americas, and not ANY TICK species. people actually went a little crazy with the Rx. basically people have what psyches called, delusional parasitosis, or psychosomatic disorders, i visited these forums and it seems alot of these people have mental illness+ they long term damage from using supplements and plant extracts that are likely somewhat toxic. seems pervasive in the midwest, and what a surprise chronic use of antibiotics from these "lyme doctors" also have cause long term damage. and this pairs with homeopathy/naturopathy/alternative medication.

Most MSMs prior to trumps 2nd or 1st term is not "liberal leftist" media, none existed for decades. the only 1 i see was a podcast/on a obscure channel and time Demcry now! is the closest thing to be talking even something remotely "left". every other just fawns over "Fallen soldiers" even cnn did often, plus its significant amount of copaganda show.

also recently the artemis launch is , and the cold war launches are wildly still believed by asians as faked, and done in by studio. the most common excuse is why "is there wind in space, because the flag is "flapping"...etc. i was actually surprised older asians still widely believe it. during 2019, and currently to.

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Only to your point about leftist media, I use this as a reference point often: https://app.adfontesmedia.com/chart/interactive

I see however it has also been enshitified slightly over the years.

load more comments
view more: next ›